From: Simon Perreault [simon(_dot_)perreault(_at_)viagenie(_dot_)ca]
On 2011-10-20 08:41, George, Wes wrote:
I'm also completely mystified as to why IPv6 support for all
proposed/requested features is not an explicitly stated requirement,
even at this phase.
And more generally, this should be considered an opportunity for
dogfooding the protocols we create. IPv6 is one of them. SIP, RTP, the
XCON stuff, and XMPP could be others.
I agree with the sentiment, but at *this* stage, that is, *finding*
someone to write the requirements, the RFP should not include specific
requirements for the remote participation system.
Dale
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf