ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: An Antitrust Policy for the IETF

2011-11-28 17:54:43
Here is one lawsuit that I noticed in the press this summer:
http://www.cellular-news.com/story/50118.php


On Nov 28, 2011, at 3:35 PM, GTW wrote:

Ted, I like your approach of enquiring what problem we are striving to solve 
and I like Russ's concise answer that it is "Recent suits against other SDOs 
that  is the source of the concern" 
 
Russ, what are  some of the  "Recent suits against other SDOs"  It would be 
good to pin down the problem we are addressing
 
There is  FTC and N-data matter from 2008 
http://www.gtwassociates.com/alerts/Ndata1.htm
 
But the solutions in discussion in various SDOs to the issues raised in that 
matter have to do with  revisions to IP policies  more than with  antitrust 
policy.
 
Best Regards,
 
George T. Willingmyre, P.E.
President, GTW Associates
1012 Parrs Ridge Drive
Spencerville, MD 20868 USA
1.301.421.4138
----- Original Message -----
From: IETF Chair
To: Ted Hardie
Cc: IETF ; IESG
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: An Antitrust Policy for the IETF

Ted:

The IETF legal counsel and insurance agent suggest that the IETF ought to 
have an antitrust policy.  To address this need, a lawyer is needed.  As a 
way forward, I suggest that IASA pay a lawyer to come up with an initial 
draft, and then this draft be brought to the community for review and 
comment (and probably revision).  I think a new mail list should be used for 
the discussion.  Once the new mail list reaches rough consensus on the 
antitrust policy document, I suggest using the usual process for adopting 
the policy as an IETF BCP.

What do others think?  I am open to suggestions for an alternative approach.


Sorry, can you expand on the threat model here?  Are we developing one in 
order to defend against some specific worry about our not having one?  
Because it has become best practice in other SDOs?  Because the insurance 
agent wishes to see something in particular?

I hesitate to develop something that we have not needed in the past unless 
it is clear what benefit it gives us.  In particular, if we develop one 
without some particular characteristic, do we lose the benefits of being 
where we are now?

Recent suits against other SDOs is the source of the concern.  The idea is t 
make it clear which topics are off limits at IETF meetings and on IETF mail 
lists.  In this way, if such discussions take place, the good name of the 
IETF can be kept clean.

Russ


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf