Ralph,
I'm not sure what would take longer - getting new subscriber gws
supporting 240/4 or IPv6 into the field, and I know which one I'd prefer
vendor engineers to be working on ;-).
Chris
On 12/1/11 6:06 AM, "Ralph Droms" <rdroms(_dot_)ietf(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Those subscriber GWs would have to handle 240.0.0.0/10 traffic correctly,
and there would likely have to be some small amount of parallel RFC 1918
space in the ISP core network for servers, hosts, etc. Of course, I'm
not an operator, so I'd be happy to hear why I'm confused.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf