Re: Consensus Call: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request

Subject: RE: Consensus Call: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request Date: 
Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 09:15:16AM -0500 Quoting Lee Howard 
(lee(_at_)asgard(_dot_)org):
 
> Which problem did ISPs create?
By dragging their feet to the inevitable roll-out of v6 they checked
the demand for consumer electronics compatible with v6. If v6 connectivity
had been norm 6 years ago we'd have more v6-ready devices deployed today.

> The problem CGN partially solves is providing connectivity for IPv4-only
> consumer electronics.  Renumbering the home network within RFC1918 
> doesn't provide additional connectivity.
When the home router is reconfigured to not have the same prefix on
the inside as on the outside, connectivity will improve. It won't be
"Internet" (couldn't be without real addresses on all interfaces)
but something closely resembling it. A lot more satisfactory than the
unexplainable failure with identical addresses inside and out.

-- 
Måns Nilsson     primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE                             +46 705 989668
HUMAN REPLICAS are inserted into VATS of NUTRITIONAL YEAST ...

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf