ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Consensus Call: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request

2011-12-03 06:26:09
Mark Andrews wrote:

224/10 could be made to work with new equipement provided there was
also signaling that the equipment supported it.  That doesn't help
ISP that have new customers with old equipment and no addresses.

Yes, it takes time.

However, 224/4 (or most of it) and 240/4 (except for 255.255.255.255)
should be released for unicast uses to reduce market price on
IPv4 addresses.

                                                Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>