ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11.txt> (DKIM Authorized Third-Party Signers) to Experimental RFC

2011-12-04 15:28:18
With ATPS, the requirement is to replace the d= string with the domain name 
from 
the From: field.  That replacement value is then passed to the assessment 
module.

In other words, DKIM provides it's own identifier to be used for assessment, 
whereas ATPS dictates use of the From: field domain name for assessment.

At least one of us is confused here.

ADSP already dictates use of the From: domain.  ATPS is a modification
to ADSP.  It doesn't change anything that DKIM reports, only the rule
for deciding whether ADSP finds an Author Domain Signature.  

With or without ADSP or ATPS, DKIM returns a possibly empty list of d=
domains from valid signatures.  ADSP returns the practices value
(unknown/all/discardable) and a bit whether it found an Author Domain
signature.  Since there might be multiple DKIM signatures, even if
ADSP says it found an Author Domain signature, you can't assume a d=
domain had any relationship to the From: domain.

It's true that ATPS adds a field to DKIM signatures that doesn't
affect DKIM evaluation, but DKIM already knows how to skip over fields
it doesn't understand.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>