Pete Resnick wrote:
and can be used by other
people who build sane equipment that understands "shared" addresses can
appear on two different interfaces.
With so complicated functionality of NAT today, the only
practical approach to build such equipment is to make it
a double NAT
Correct.
Note that the double NAT, here, is AN equipment.
Can IETF allocate such address?
That's what this document is doing: Allocating address space to go
between 2 NATs.
Maybe I don't understand your question?
My point is that those who are arguing against the proposed
allocation because of the capability of a double NAT
equipment should argue for allocation of another space
to enable development of the double NAT equipment.
Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf