On Oct 26, 2012, at 8:16 AM, Eliot Lear <lear(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:
Andrew,
On 10/25/12 9:52 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
Oh, for heaven's sake. This is nothing to do with punishment. This is
a straightforward administrative problem. Turning this into an
opportunity to exercise a heavyweight and in fact punitive process
would be an injustice. If the IETF has wound itself into such
bureaucratic knots that we can't just make an exceptional decision in
exceptional circumstances, we are in much worse trouble than I thought. A
And as of yet nobody has challenged the need to remove Marshall. We've
just gone off the deep end on process.
What?! You are trying to say that the IETF ratholed on process? Never…
http://www.cafepress.com/mf/33235226/ietf-process-organic-cotton-tee_tshirt
W
Yes, let's close the process
problem as Brian said in due course. Let's also not rush through the
changes for all the reasons that John Klensin wrote, plus another: I
don't like the proposed approach, but that's for another message.
Eliot
--
"When it comes to glittering objects, wizards have all the taste and
self-control of a deranged magpie."
-- Terry Pratchett