Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL

On Nov 6, 2012, at 10:25, John Levine <johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com> wrote:
> Perhaps "disclose that fact promptly."
+1

Since not everyone is aware of what's going on in the IRTF: we recently made a 
minor modification to our IPR statement to that effect. See 
https://www.irtf.org/ipr

One possibility would be that the IESG adopt what we did for the IRTF also for 
the IRTF...

Lars

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature