Brian:
Jorge has reviewed this text. He says that the current text and this proposed
text are both summaries. Both say that it is important to read the BCP to get
all of the details.
Russ
On Nov 6, 2012, at 10:25 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
I don't much like the change in approach. I think it will be too easy
to brush off; the current approach has enough substance that people
who brush it off put themselves in a very weak position.
The old text was written with legal advice. What does counsel say
about the new proposal?
Regards
Brian Carpenter
Cell phone during IETF85: +1 847 219 0880
On 06/11/2012 15:00, IETF Chair wrote:
The IESG is considering a revision to the NOTE WELL text. Please review and
comment.
Russ
=== Proposed Revised NOTE WELL Text ===
Note Well
This summary is only meant to point you in the right direction, and
doesn't have all the nuances. The IETF's IPR Policy is set forth in
BCP 79; please read it carefully.
The brief summary:
- By participating with the IETF, you agree to follow IETF processes.
- If you are aware that a contribution of yours (something you write,
say, or discuss in any IETF context) is covered by patents or patent
applications, you need to disclose that fact.
- You understand that meetings might be recorded, broadcast, and
publicly archived.
For further information: Talk to a chair, ask an Area Director, or
review BCP 9 (on the Internet Standards Process), BCP 25 (on the
Working Group processes), BCP 78 (on the IETF Trust), and BCP 79 (on
Intellectual Property Rights in the IETF).