On Nov 29, 2012, at 4:42, Eliot Lear wrote:
A simpler explanation is that the authors and editors of work are more
immersed than others, and therefore project more authority.
To me, when "projecting authority" one is either demonstrating a deeper
understanding of the topic than others or is bullying the others. So I have a
mixed reaction to that statement. One the one hand it could be that work done
elsewhere and brought the IETF comes along with people helping to educate the
IETF or comes with people bullying the IETF.
I guess what I'm trying to express is that when baked work is brought into the
IETF it is subjective whether the process is healthy or not.
Earlier in the thread I saw that someone expressed dismay that BOFs seem to be
WG's that have already been meeting in secret. I agree with that. At the last
meeting in Atlanta, I filled in sessions with BOFs and found that the ones I
chose seemed as if they were already on the way to a predetermined solution.
Only one had a presentation trying to set up the problem to be solved, others
just had detailed talks on draft solutions. In one there was a complaint that
the mail list wasn't very active - not a WG, a BOF! Not very engaging.
Bringing in baked work because there are multiple independent and
non-interoperable solutions is what the IETF is all about. Bringing in a baked
specification just to get a stamp on it is not.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis
NeuStar You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468
There are no answers - just tradeoffs, decisions, and responses.