Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"


On 11/28/12 12:57 PM, Randy Bush wrote:

I'm increasingly seeing a "paradigm" where the review happens _before_
adoption as a WG draft.

and one consequence is that the design gets done outside of the ietf
process.


But this isn't necessarily a bad thing.  It's nice to have reasonably
well thought out ideas come in.

Eliot

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", (continued) Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Geoff Huston Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", David Meyer Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", John C Klensin Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", David Morris Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Hector Santos Message not available Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", SM Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", John Leslie Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Randy Bush Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Yoav Nir RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Dearlove, Christopher (UK) Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Eliot Lear <= Pre-IETF work ( was - Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), Dave Crocker Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Geoff Huston Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Eliot Lear Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Edward Lewis Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", SM Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Brian E Carpenter Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", John C Klensin Barely literate minutes (was: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), SM Re: Barely literate minutes (was: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), John C Klensin Re: Barely literate minutes, Scott Brim