Re: Running code, take 2

> to clarify, my proposal only applies to Internet Drafts, and clearly 
> states that the implementation section should be removed from the 
> document before it is published as RFC.
>
> Formally, we don't want non-permanent stuff in RFCs. And realistically, 
> even if we had an implementation wiki, it is unlikely to be kept up to 
> date once the RFC is published.
so, we act on implementation and interoperability data which are not
kept?

randy