IETF Discussion (date)
December 31, 2012
- Re: [ih] 30th Anniversary of Transition to TCP/IP, Randy Bush, 16:21
- Re: 30th Anniversary of Transition to TCP/IP, Lixia Zhang, 15:12
- Re: WCIT outcome?, John Day, 15:10
- Re: 30th Anniversary of Transition to TCP/IP, Noel Chiappa, 13:27
- Re: 30th Anniversary of Transition to TCP/IP, Victor Ndonnang, 12:41
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 12:05
- 30th Anniversary of Transition to TCP/IP, IETF Chair, 11:23
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., Janet P Gunn, 11:01
- Re: WCIT outcome?, John Day, 08:51
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Masataka Ohta, 05:50
December 29, 2012
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Patrik Fältström, 16:46
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., Steven Bellovin, 15:58
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 12:19
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., Dave Crocker, 10:54
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., Greg Shepherd, 09:29
- travel guide for the next IETF..., Dave Crocker, 09:19
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Masataka Ohta, 06:20
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Jorge Amodio, 04:43
- WCIT outcome?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 00:27
December 21, 2012
- Re: Last Call: <draft-hanes-dispatch-fax-capability-06.txt> (Indicating Fax over IP Capability in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed Standard, Gonzalo Salgueiro, 14:21
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, SM, 13:02
- Re: Last Call: <draft-hanes-dispatch-fax-capability-06.txt> (Indicating Fax over IP Capability in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed Standard, Hadriel Kaplan, 12:29
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11, Ted Lemon, 11:22
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11, Ted Lemon, 11:21
- RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11, RAMAKRISHNADTV, 11:21
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-evrc-nw-0, Peter Yee, 11:20
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11, Ben Campbell, 10:37
- RE: draft-bonica-special-purpose-04.txt, Ronald Bonica, 09:51
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11, Ben Campbell, 09:45
- RE: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, Ronald Bonica, 09:44
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11, Ben Campbell, 09:40
- Re: draft-bonica-special-purpose-04.txt, John C Klensin, 09:19
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, Pete Resnick, 09:09
- draft-bonica-special-purpose-04.txt, Randy Bush, 08:45
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, SM, 02:19
December 20, 2012
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, Donald Eastlake, 18:57
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, Pete Resnick, 17:33
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, Geoff Huston, 17:15
- RE: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, Ronald Bonica, 16:48
- Re: [trill] Last Call: <draft-ietf-trill-oam-req-04.txt> (Requirements for Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) in TRILL (Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links)) to Informational RFC, gayle noble, 10:19
- Re: Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06, Mahesh Jethanandani, 10:18
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Matthew Morley, 10:18
- Re: [karp] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06, Anantha Ramaiah, 10:17
- Re: Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06, Joel M. Halpern, 08:17
December 19, 2012
- Re: [karp] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06, Nick Hilliard, 17:21
- Re: Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06, Nick Hilliard, 17:14
- Re: Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06, Nick Hilliard, 16:26
- Re: Happy Holidays & Winter Break Notice, Steve Conte, 16:04
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11, Ben Campbell, 15:15
- Happy Holidays & Winter Break Notice, Alexa Morris, 14:55
- Internet Hall of Fame Celebrates Internet Leaders: Second Annual Induction Ceremony Set for June 2013 in Istanbul, Turkey, Russ Housley, 12:11
- Re: [trill] Last Call: <draft-ietf-trill-oam-req-04.txt> (Requirements for Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) in TRILL (Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links)) to Informational RFC, Donald Eastlake, 09:55
December 18, 2012
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham, 21:19
- Re: Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06, Ben Campbell, 16:50
- Re: Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06, Joel M. Halpern, 16:26
- Re: Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06, Nick Hilliard, 16:13
- Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06, Ben Campbell, 14:15
- RE: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Manger, James H, 11:09
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08, Paul C. Bryan, 11:09
- Orlando IETF Codesprint, IETF Chair, 09:50
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-06.txt> (IPv6 and UDP Checksums for Tunneled Packets) to Proposed Standard, Magnus Westerlund, 04:32
December 17, 2012
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, James M Snell, 23:25
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, James M Snell, 21:54
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Robert Sayre, 21:41
- Re: draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07 - array index for end ofarray, Bill McQuillan, 18:56
- Re: draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07 - array index for end ofarray, Mark Nottingham, 18:37
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08, Mark Nottingham, 18:11
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-06.txt> (IPv6 and UDP Checksums for Tunneled Packets) to Proposed Standard, John William Atwood, 17:56
- Last call comments on draft-ietf-bliss-call-completion-18., Dale R. Worley, 15:43
- Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-algorithm-agility-08.txt> (Algorithm Agility Procedure for RPKI.) to Proposed Standard, Eric Osterweil, 15:42
- Re: draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07 - array index for end ofarray, Martin Thomson, 15:31
- Re: draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07 - array index for end ofarray, Barry Leiba, 13:54
- Re: [pkix] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-schaad-pkix-rfc2875-bis-03.txt> (Diffie-Hellman Proof-of-Possession Algorithms) to Proposed Standard, Denis Pinkas, 10:34
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Matthew Morley, 10:34
- RE: [sip-clf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-11.txt> (The Common Log Format (CLF) for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP): Framework and Data Model) to Proposed Standard, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 10:03
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, James M Snell, 09:09
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Robert Sayre, 08:19
- Re: draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07 - array index for end ofarray, David J. Biesack, 08:03
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Robert Sayre, 04:02
December 16, 2012
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham, 23:42
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Robert Sayre, 22:36
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham, 22:19
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham, 22:00
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham, 21:41
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham, 21:40
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham, 21:30
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08, Mark Nottingham, 21:26
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, James M Snell, 20:36
- Re: draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07 - array index for end ofarray, Mark Nottingham, 18:34
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham, 18:32
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 17:54
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Barry Leiba, 17:13
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-daboo-ical-vcard-parameter-encoding-02, Roni Even, 17:00
- Re: The notion of "fast tracking" drafts, Stephen Farrell, 16:39
- Running code draft -01, Yaron Sheffer, 16:30
- Re: The notion of "fast tracking" drafts, Keith Moore, 16:28
- Re: The notion of "fast tracking" drafts, Stephen Farrell, 15:50
- Re: The notion of "fast tracking" drafts, John C Klensin, 14:50
- Re: The notion of "fast tracking" drafts, Keith Moore, 14:09
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, James M Snell, 10:03
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, James M Snell, 10:02
- RE: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Markus Lanthaler, 10:02
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08, Roni Even, 01:35
December 15, 2012
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Robert Sayre, 22:36
- Re: Running code, take 2, John C Klensin, 15:14
- Re: Running code, take 2, Yaron Sheffer, 10:04
- Re: The notion of "fast tracking" drafts, Stephen Farrell, 08:59
December 14, 2012
- Re: Running code, take 2, John C Klensin, 17:15
- The notion of "fast tracking" drafts (was: Re: Running code, take 2), John C Klensin, 17:10
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, David J. Biesack, 12:38
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, David J. Biesack, 12:18
- draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07 - array index for end ofarray, David J. Biesack, 12:17
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, David J. Biesack, 12:16
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, David J. Biesack, 12:15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, David J. Biesack, 12:08
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, James M Snell, 11:34
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, James M Snell, 11:33
- Re: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-08.txt> (Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0) to Proposed Standard, zhou . sujing, 11:33
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-08.txt> (Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0) to Proposed Standard, Chuck Mortimore, 11:32
- RE: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Markus Lanthaler, 11:31
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-08.txt> (Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0) to Proposed Standard, Nat Sakimura, 11:31
- RE: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Markus Lanthaler, 11:30
- Re: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-08.txt> (Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0) to Proposed Standard, zhou . sujing, 11:30
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-08.txt> (Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0) to Proposed Standard, Chuck Mortimore, 11:29
- Re: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-08.txt> (Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0) to Proposed Standard, zhou . sujing, 11:28
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-08.txt> (Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0) to Proposed Standard, Chuck Mortimore, 11:27
- Re: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-08.txt> (Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0) to Proposed Standard, zhou . sujing, 11:27
- Re: Running code, take 2, Yaron Sheffer, 10:17
- Re: Running code, take 2, Stephen Farrell, 07:19
- Re: Running code, take 2, Riccardo Bernardini, 07:07
- Re: Running code, take 2, Yaron Sheffer, 07:04
- Re: Running code, take 2, Alessandro Vesely, 06:37
- Re: Running code, take 2, Randy Bush, 06:31
- Re: Running code, take 2, Randy Bush, 06:10
- Re: Running code, take 2, t.p., 05:25
- Re: Running code, take 2, t.p., 05:18
- Re: Running code, take 2, Yaron Sheffer, 02:50
December 13, 2012
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Running code, take 2, John C Klensin, 19:18
- Re: Running code, take 2, Melinda Shore, 18:44
- Re: Running code, take 2, Randy Bush, 18:11
- Re: Running code, take 2, John C Klensin, 16:48
- Re: Running code, take 2, Yaron Sheffer, 15:52
- Re: Running code, take 2, Randy Bush, 12:21
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-08.txt> (Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0) to Proposed Standard, zhou . sujing, 12:21
- Re: Running code, take 2, Melinda Shore, 12:20
- Re: Running code, take 2, Randy Bush, 12:14
- Re: Running code, take 2, Melinda Shore, 12:04
- Re: Running code, take 2, Loa Andersson, 10:10
- Re: Running code, take 2, Ted Hardie, 10:02
- RE: Running code, take 2, Yaron Sheffer, 10:00
- Re: Running code, take 2, Marc Blanchet, 09:39
- Re: Running code, take 2, Loa Andersson, 09:23
- Re: Running code, take 2, Marc Blanchet, 09:18
- RE: Running code, take 2, Adrian Farrel, 09:14
- Re: Running code, take 2, Yaron Sheffer, 09:12
- RE: Running code, take 2, Adrian Farrel, 09:11
- Re: Running code, take 2, Marc Blanchet, 09:05
- Re: Running code, take 2, Yaron Sheffer, 09:00
- Re: Running code, take 2, Marc Blanchet, 08:55
- Re: Running code, take 2, Yaron Sheffer, 08:53
- Re: Running code, take 2, Yaron Sheffer, 08:48
- Re: Running code, take 2, Marc Blanchet, 08:18
- RE: Running code, take 2, Adrian Farrel, 08:17
- Re: Running code, take 2, Alessandro Vesely, 07:58
December 12, 2012
- Re: Presentation vs. Discussion sessions (was: PowerPoint considered harmful), Randall Gellens, 23:33
- call for papers - IEEE "From Research to Standards" workshop, Joe Touch, 16:32
- Running code, take 2, Yaron Sheffer, 13:31
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-evrc-nw-08, Peter Yee, 12:29
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Dick Franks, 12:29
- Re: [trill] Last Call: <draft-ietf-trill-oam-req-04.txt> (Requirements for Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) in TRILL (Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links)) to Informational RFC, gayle noble, 12:28
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Paul C. Bryan, 12:27
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, James M Snell, 12:27
December 11, 2012
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Barry Leiba, 22:25
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham, 19:15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Barry Leiba, 19:01
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham, 18:32
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Barry Leiba, 18:24
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham, 17:43
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham, 17:41
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Pier-Luc Thériault, 17:33
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Pier-Luc Thériault, 17:13
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Barry Leiba, 09:26
December 09, 2012
- Re: A mailing list protocol, Randall Gellens, 20:39
- Re: A mailing list protocol, Randall Gellens, 20:29
- RE: A mailing list protocol, Randall Gellens, 20:18
- Re: A mailing list protocol, Randy Bush, 16:40
- Re: A mailing list protocol, Hector Santos, 15:21
- Re: A mailing list protocol, John C Klensin, 15:17
- Re: A mailing list protocol, Nick Hilliard, 14:55
- Re: A mailing list protocol, Melinda Shore, 14:40
- Re: A mailing list protocol, S Moonesamy, 14:13
December 06, 2012
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: A mailing list protocol, John Levine, 15:24
- Re: A mailing list protocol, Alessandro Vesely, 12:03
- RE: A mailing list protocol, Dave Cridland, 11:25
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-06.txt> (Increasing TCP's Initial Window) to Experimental RFC, Magnus Westerlund, 04:01
December 05, 2012
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-05.txt, Ben Campbell, 16:15
- Re: draft-farrell-ft-01.txt -- what signal are we attempting to sense?, Stephen Farrell, 15:56
- Re: draft-farrell-ft-01.txt -- what signal are we attempting to sense?, Ted Hardie, 13:37
- Re: draft-farrell-ft-01.txt -- what signal are we attempting to sense?, Stephen Farrell, 11:59
- draft-farrell-ft-01.txt -- what signal are we attempting to sense?, Ted Hardie, 11:22
- Re: A mailing list protocol, S Moonesamy, 10:54
- Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Dave Crocker, 10:25
- Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Marc Blanchet, 10:10
- RE: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo), 10:02
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell, 08:52
- RE: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Abdussalam Baryun, 08:44
- Re: English spoken here, John C Klensin, 08:29
- Re: A mailing list protocol, Arturo Servin, 08:17
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Abdussalam Baryun, 07:59
- Re: English spoken here, Steven Bellovin, 07:45
December 04, 2012
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Danny McPherson, 22:05
- Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Doug Barton, 21:10
- Re: English spoken here, Keith Moore, 21:04
- Re: A mailing list protocol, Scott Brim, 19:35
- RE: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Lee Howard, 17:22
- Re: A mailing list protocol, Martin Thomson, 16:56
- Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Tony Hansen, 16:35
- RE: A mailing list protocol, George, Wes, 16:19
- Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Donald Eastlake, 15:42
- Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Hannes Tschofenig, 14:48
- A mailing list protocol, S Moonesamy, 14:46
- Re: request to make the "tools version" of the agenda the default, Wes Hardaker, 12:27
- Re: request to make the "tools version" of the agenda the default, Wes Hardaker, 12:26
- Re: English spoken here (was: PowerPoint considered harmful), Steven Bellovin, 11:50
- Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Dave Crocker, 11:48
- RE: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo), 11:33
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-deployment-07, Black, David, 11:32
- RE: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Adrian Farrel, 09:51
- Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Keith Moore, 08:55
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Barry Leiba, 08:47
- Re: When do we ask community for opinion and When we produce an RFC for the community?, Abdussalam Baryun, 08:19
- Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), Abdussalam Baryun, 08:14
- Re: Presentation vs. Discussion sessions (was: PowerPoint considered harmful), Abdussalam Baryun, 07:46
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Abdussalam Baryun, 07:32
- Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Tim Chown, 07:30
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Randy Bush, 06:09
- Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Brian E Carpenter, 04:24
- Re: The flower standard, Pars Mutaf, 04:19
- The flower standard, Pars Mutaf, 03:22
- Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, joel jaeggli, 02:39
- RE: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo), 02:29
- Re: request to make the "tools version" of the agenda the default, Julian Reschke, 01:35
- Re: I-D Action: draft-farrell-ft-01.txt, Yoav Nir, 00:02
December 03, 2012
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., "Martin J. Dürst", 23:47
- Re: I-D Action: draft-farrell-ft-01.txt, Andrew G. Malis, 20:02
- Re: I-D Action: draft-farrell-ft-01.txt, Andrew G. Malis, 20:00
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, Geoff Huston, 17:25
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell, 16:53
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., David Morris, 16:50
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell, 16:42
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, Ronald Bonica, 16:34
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Jari Arkko, 16:04
- Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, SM, 15:39
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Joel M. Halpern, 15:37
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Jari Arkko, 15:19
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Jari Arkko, 15:16
- Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Bob Hinden, 13:59
- Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Hannes Tschofenig, 13:37
- Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, SM, 12:39
- Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), Fred Baker (fred), 12:25
- Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Fred Baker (fred), 12:11
- RE: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), George, Wes, 11:44
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Marc Petit-Huguenin, 11:06
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell, 10:55
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Marc Petit-Huguenin, 10:41
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell, 10:23
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Sam Hartman, 10:21
- Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Brian E Carpenter, 10:07
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Melinda Shore, 09:48
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-05.txt, Mahesh Jethanandani, 09:48
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-federated-fs-protocol-14, Chuck Lever, 09:47
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-federated-fs-protocol-14, Peter Yee, 09:46
- Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Hannes Tschofenig, 09:42
- comment on draft-crocker-id-adoption, Loa Andersson, 09:23
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Barry Leiba, 09:21
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Elwyn Davies, 09:15
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell, 08:54
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Barry Leiba, 08:51
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Dave Crocker, 08:46
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Elwyn Davies, 08:42
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Carsten Bormann, 08:41
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Elwyn Davies, 08:39
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Barry Leiba, 08:36
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell, 08:29
- Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Keith Moore, 08:29
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Barry Leiba, 08:25
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Dave Crocker, 08:13
- RE: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Adrian Farrel, 07:59
- RE: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), George, Wes, 07:57
- RE: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), George, Wes, 07:53
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Russ Housley, 07:48
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell, 07:43
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., John C Klensin, 06:30
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell, 05:29
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Brian E Carpenter, 05:15
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Brian E Carpenter, 05:02
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell, 04:49
- Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Tim Chown, 03:50
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stewart Bryant, 02:07
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft (off-topic), SM, 00:06
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., "Martin J. Dürst", 00:01
December 02, 2012
- Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Melinda Shore, 23:03
- Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Dave Crocker, 22:55
- Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), joel jaeggli, 22:33
- Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Randy Bush, 22:09
- Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Joel jaeggli, 22:06
- Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Keith Moore, 22:05
- Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Randy Bush, 21:52
- Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Joel jaeggli, 21:49
- Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Keith Moore, 21:03
- Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), joel jaeggli, 20:27
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Melinda Shore, 18:26
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Arturo Servin, 18:24
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Melinda Shore, 18:12
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Randy Bush, 18:07
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Arturo Servin, 18:05
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Arturo Servin, 17:56
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Randy Bush, 17:53
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Randy Bush, 17:50
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Arturo Servin, 17:35
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, SM, 16:37
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Dave Crocker, 14:33
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Arturo Servin, 14:25
- Re: English spoken here (was: PowerPoint considered harmful), SM, 14:24
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Melinda Shore, 14:22
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Arturo Servin, 14:18
- Acculturation [was Re: PowerPoint considered harmful], Brian E Carpenter, 13:28
- Re: Presentation vs. Discussion sessions, Keith Moore, 13:26
- Re: Presentation vs. Discussion sessions, Melinda Shore, 13:21
- Re: Presentation vs. Discussion sessions, Keith Moore, 13:18
- Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Keith Moore, 13:15
- Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), joel jaeggli, 12:48
- Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Dave Crocker, 12:47
- Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Randall Gellens, 12:45
- Re: Presentation vs. Discussion sessions, Melinda Shore, 12:42
- Presentation vs. Discussion sessions (was: PowerPoint considered harmful), Keith Moore, 12:37
- Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Melinda Shore, 12:07
- Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Keith Moore, 12:06
- Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Keith Moore, 11:59
- Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Dave Crocker, 11:58
- Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Keith Moore, 11:51
- Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), John C Klensin, 11:50
- Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Dave Crocker, 11:42
- Re: English spoken here (was: PowerPoint considered harmful), John C Klensin, 11:21
- Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Joel M. Halpern, 11:20
- English spoken here (was: PowerPoint considered harmful), SM, 10:37
- Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), John Levine, 10:27
- Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Keith Moore, 09:12
- Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), John C Klensin, 09:04
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell, 09:01
- Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Keith Moore, 08:54
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell, 08:49
- Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), John C Klensin, 08:45
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell, 08:42
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell, 08:38
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell, 08:34
- Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Keith Moore, 07:41
- Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), SM, 03:16
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Brian E Carpenter, 02:42
- Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Brian E Carpenter, 02:28
- Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Keith Moore, 02:08
- Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Randall Gellens, 01:33
- Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Melinda Shore, 00:30
- Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Randy Bush, 00:20
December 01, 2012
- Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Randall Gellens, 23:53
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Hector Santos, 20:19
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Hector Santos, 18:47
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Barry Leiba, 18:28
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Barry Leiba, 18:22
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Melinda Shore, 17:52
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell, 17:22
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Dave Crocker, 17:14
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell, 17:05
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell, 16:57
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Barry Leiba, 16:22
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Dave Crocker, 16:13
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Yoav Nir, 15:22
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., SM, 15:09
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Melinda Shore, 15:00
- Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Dave Crocker, 14:37
- Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell, 14:13
- Re: Barely literate minutes, Dave Crocker, 13:23
- Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), Dave Crocker, 13:07
- PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Keith Moore, 08:48
- Re: Barely literate minutes, Keith Moore, 08:40