On 12/1/12 2:21 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
My reluctance to get into this is based on an opinion that process
change proposals with more words attached tend to just not happen,
so fewer words is better.
I think that's actually a pretty terrible reason. The goal is
not to get the proposal through, the goal is to improve
something. That said, while I don't like change just for the
sake of change I think that change for the sake of betterment is
a very good thing indeed. The main thing is that I've been trying
to figure out where the harm would be here and I haven't been
able to identify anything substantive. I'd be good with giving
this a limited run and seeing how it goes.
Melinda