Re: Running code, take 2
2012-12-13 08:48:29
Thanks Alessandro. I couldn't think of a specific count (10? 100?) for
the success criteria, which is why the criteria are rather fuzzy. The
experiment's summary report does promise to list adoption statistics.
Best,
Yaron
On 12/13/2012 03:57 PM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On Wed 12/Dec/2012 20:31:04 +0100 Yaron Sheffer wrote:
I have just published a draft that proposes an alternative to
Stephen's "fast track". My proposal simply allows authors to document,
in a semi-standard way, whatever implementations exist for their
protocol, as well as their interoperability.
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-sheffer-running-code-00.txt
[...]
I am looking forward to comments and discussion on this list.
As an occasional I-D reader, I'd appreciate "Implementation Status"
sections, including IPR info. I don't think anything forbids to add
such sections, if the authors wish. I'd add a count of the number of
I-Ds that actually have it among the experiment's success criteria.
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: Running code, take 2, (continued)
- Re: Running code, take 2, Marc Blanchet
- Re: Running code, take 2, Loa Andersson
- Re: Running code, take 2, Marc Blanchet
- Re: Running code, take 2, Loa Andersson
- Re: Running code, take 2, t.p.
- Re: Running code, take 2, t.p.
- Re: Running code, take 2, Randy Bush
- Re: Running code, take 2, Yaron Sheffer
Re: Running code, take 2,
Yaron Sheffer <=
Re: Running code, take 2, Ted Hardie
Re: Running code, take 2, Stephen Farrell
|
|
|