Re: [IETF] Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated Apr

Subject: Re: [IETF] Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or 
dated?April the first Date: Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 07:31:54PM +0000 Quoting Yoav 
Nir (ynir(_at_)checkpoint(_dot_)com):

> In this case I could tick that box without being a lying bastard. Just a 
> sort-of deceitful one. It is possible to configure the firewall to drop 
> packets with the evil bit set. I still went with explaining the April 1 RFC 
> concept.
You pass. 

I seem to be able to locate several implementations. Shall we initiate
work to elevate 3514 from Informational to Proposed Standard?

-- 
Måns Nilsson     primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE                             +46 705 989668
I hope the ``Eurythmics'' practice birth control ...

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature