On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Randy Bush <randy(_at_)psg(_dot_)com> wrote:
Re-formulating the LC text sounds like an excellent idea, to call for
more substantive comments.
perhaps we should go to the source of the problem and require a phd
dissertation and defense from draft authors.
how much process chaos can we create?
I think using a reductio ad absurdum is a little unfair when I've
demonstrated that the proposed reformulation works (whilst being purely
voluntary) in a similar organization with common participants.
In particular, I'm not suggesting any change to process.
Dave.