ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org

2013-06-21 09:49:51
Hi Stewart,

I don't have any problem with the report/reminder only that it has missing
important information. The subjects of discussions are not counted, so I
counted them. Also the report does not distinguish between general-posting
and replying to IETF LCs.

AB


On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Stewart Bryant <stbryant(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> 
wrote:


AB

Thomas started posting these weekly reports many years
ago as a service to the community to remind us all that
posting to ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org contributes to the information
and work overload of the IETF community as a whole.

The numbers are a reminder to think carefully about what
you send to the list and to only send what you consider
to be sufficiently important that the community as
a whole needs to be aware of it.

Most members of the IETF community  try their best to
minimize their so called "Narten Number". Many
regard these postings as a useful service, and I for
one, thank him for doing it.

- Stewart