ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: pgp signing in van

2013-09-09 07:44:50
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 9/8/13 10:28 PM, l(_dot_)wood(_at_)surrey(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk wrote:
There is no upside.

By signing your mail you lose plausible deniability, remove legal
doubt as to what you said...

Why do you think that cryptographic doubt = legal doubt? I've heard
that claim many times, but I've never heard an argument for it.

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=rJSY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----