Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus

> As I noted in my review of the draft, the document has a core flaw in
> its sense of history.  It has invented an interpretation of "rough
> consensus" that was not part of its original formulation.
>
> I consider the current focus on reconciling minority views to be quite an 
> excellent enhancement to that original interpretation, but it really is an 
> addition.
Ok. I was not there at the time to witness the history. Thanks for the 
clarification.

Jari