Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus

ietf

Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus

2013-10-11 12:12:05

On Oct 11, 2013, at 8:15 AM, Scott O Bradner <sob(_at_)sobco(_dot_)com> wrote:

The process in the ID is not what was followed when I was an AD and it not 
what I have described by the meaning of the term "rough consensus" in my 
newcomers tutorials (which I have been giving since at least IETF 57 in 
2003).


Perhaps I should be embarrassed to ask this question, but how _do_ you describe 
the meaning of the term "rough consensus?"

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus, (continued) Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus, Pete Resnick Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus, Lou Berger Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus, Mikael Abrahamsson Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus, Avri Doria Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus, Dave Crocker Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus, Jari Arkko Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus, Scott Brim Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus, Ted Hardie Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus, Abdussalam Baryun Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus, Scott O Bradner Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus, Ted Lemon <= Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus, Pete Resnick

Previous by Date:	Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-05.txt> (Multicast Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks (MPL)) to Proposed Standard, Ralph Droms
Next by Date:	RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard, Templin, Fred L
Previous by Thread:	Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus, Scott O Bradner
Next by Thread:	Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus, Pete Resnick
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]