The draft does not list ITU in abbreviation, there are many terminology not
clear but more general definition. I prefer specific defining. Also many
times refers to references to define without mentioning what was that
definition, is that defined only in ITU and IETF cannot define its
technology, or is it agreeing on a joint definition so IETF is just
following ITU in some terms.
AB
On Sunday, October 13, 2013, Roni Even wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.****
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.****
Document: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-12****
Reviewer: Roni Even****
Review Date:2013–10–12****
IETF LC End Date: 2013-10–16****
IESG Telechat date: ****
** **
Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.****
** **
** **
Major issues:****
Minor issues:****
** **
Nits/editorial comments:****
** **
** **