Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars(_dot_)techno(_dot_)cat(_at

Personal opinion:

1. We shouldn't tolerate anonymous postings in any case.

2. ISOC salaries are utterly irrelevant to any IETF discussion.
It's just way out of line.

Beyond that, our sergeant at arms is responsible for judging
misuse of the list.

Regards
   Brian

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars(_dot_)techno(_dot_)cat(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com, Brian E Carpenter Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars(_dot_)techno(_dot_)cat(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com, Techno CAT Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars(_dot_)techno(_dot_)cat(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com, Donald Eastlake Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars(_dot_)techno(_dot_)cat(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com, Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars(_dot_)techno(_dot_)cat(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com, Barry Leiba Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars(_dot_)techno(_dot_)cat(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com, Brian E Carpenter <= Anonymous postings, SM RE: Anonymous postings, l.wood Re: Anonymous postings, Melinda Shore Re: Anonymous postings, Brian E Carpenter Re: Anonymous postings, Melinda Shore Message not available RE: Anonymous postings, SM Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars(_dot_)techno(_dot_)cat(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com, Randy Bush Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars(_dot_)techno(_dot_)cat(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com, Dave Crocker Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars(_dot_)techno(_dot_)cat(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com, Randy Bush IETF::ISOC (was Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars(_dot_)techno(_dot_)cat(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com), Dave Crocker

Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars(_dot_)techno(_dot_)cat(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com