ietf
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars(_dot_)techno(_dot_)cat(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com

2013-10-22 12:51:22
from [Randy Bush] [Permanent Link] 
as the ietf is legally f(isoc),

The IETF is not legally ISOC.


you are correct.  legally, it is a function of isoc.  sorry about the
notational shortening.

randy
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars(_dot_)techno(_dot_)cat(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com, Dave Crocker
Next by Date:  Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice, Cullen Jennings
Previous by Thread:  Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars(_dot_)techno(_dot_)cat(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com, Dave Crocker
Next by Thread:  IETF::ISOC (was Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars(_dot_)techno(_dot_)cat(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com), Dave Crocker
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]