On 10/21/13 1:37 PM, l(_dot_)wood(_at_)surrey(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk wrote:
A persistent identifier is helpful in sustained shared multiparty
conversation; whether it represents a "real" person or not does not
matter.
Right, this is clearly a problem as stated, but there's a long
history of people posting from and participating from those
addresses, while the other is some individual whose only posts
were ad hominem. So what's of interest here probably isn't
anon-/pseudonymity, but some sort of reputation or track record.
Melinda