ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb

2013-12-02 10:10:09
While I don't believe the WG would be positive on that, I do not believe that 
question has been put to a consensus call. So I would question the word 
specifically. 

If you still believe it so, please tell me when you think the WG decided this.

Keith 

-----Original Message-----
From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Ted 
Lemon
Sent: 28 November 2013 17:03
To: Dave Crocker
Cc: rtcweb-chairs(_at_)tools(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org; Eliot Lear; 
rtcweb(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; Eric Burger; IETF Discussion
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb

On Nov 28, 2013, at 11:29 AM, Dave Crocker <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net> 
wrote:
As merely one obvious example, people can simply be tired of the 
impasse and eagerly seek progress and be willing to settle on any 
mechanism they think will fairly break it -- even if it 
works against 
the outcome they prefer.

The one tidbit you may be missing is that the working group 
specifically chose not to do a coin toss.   So "willing to 
settle for any mechanism" clearly doesn't apply in this case.

_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb