Re: Problem with new Note Well

Hi,

I will (again) point at the IPR text for the I*R*TF, that we changed last year 
in an attempt to be more descriptive: http://irtf.org/ipr

I believe it captures Cullen's (and my) concern, and is still quite short.

Lars


The IRTF follows the IETF Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) disclosure rules. 
This is a summary of these rules as they relate to IRTF research group 
discussions, mailing lists and Internet Drafts:

        • If you include your own or your employer’s IPR in a contribution to 
an IRTF research group, then you must file an IPR disclosure with the IETF.

        • If you recognize your own or your employer’s IPR in someone else’s 
contribution and you are participating in the discussions in the research group 
relating to that contribution, then you must file an IPR disclosure with the 
IETF. Even if you are not participating in the discussion, the IRTF still 
requests that you file an IPR disclosure with the IETF.

        • Finally, the IRTF requests that you file an IPR disclosure with the 
IETF if you recognize IPR owned by others in any IRTF contribution.

The IRTF expects that you file IPR disclosures in a timely manner, i.e., in a 
period measured in days or weeks, not months. The IRTF prefers that the most 
liberal licensing terms possible are available for IRTF Stream documents, see 
RFC 5743. You may file an IPR disclosure 
here:http://www.ietf.org/ipr/file-disclosure

See RFC 3979 (BCP 79) for definitions of “IPR” and “contribution” and for the 
detailed rules (substituting “IRTF” for “IETF”).

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail