On 2014-1-25, at 21:24, Adrian Farrel <adrian(_at_)olddog(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk>
wrote:
It seems from the document that the content is descriptive of something
implemented by a single vendor. I applaud putting that information into the
public domain, but I don't understand the meaning of IETF consensus with
respect
to this document.
+1
The Independent RFC Stream would seem more appropriate.
Lars
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail