Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on t

On 2/19/2014 4:51 PM, l(_dot_)wood(_at_)surrey(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk wrote:

The process has not been odd.

The outcome has been expedient.

Different thing.



Maybe not.  In the IETF, an expedient outcome is pretty odd.

d/

--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, (continued) Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Joe Hildebrand Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Barry Leiba Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, John C Klensin Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Barry Leiba Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Sam Hartman Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Barry Leiba Message not available Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, S Moonesamy Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Tim Bray RE: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, l.wood Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Dave Crocker <= Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Mark Nottingham Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Eliot Lear Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Phillip Hallam-Baker Message not available Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, S Moonesamy Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Ralph Droms Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, S Moonesamy Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Phillip Hallam-Baker Message not available Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, S Moonesamy Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track, Barry Leiba

Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track