ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW

2014-03-24 02:08:29
On 2014-3-23, at 14:57, Ted Lemon <ted(_dot_)lemon(_at_)nominum(_dot_)com> 
wrote:
On Mar 23, 2014, at 4:43 AM, Eggert, Lars <lars(_at_)netapp(_dot_)com> wrote:
In terms of look & feel: I'd like the main web site (and the datatracker, 
but that's not covered by he SOW obviously) to have a clean, modern look and 
feel, be fully usable by clients with small screens, and follow ARIA 
accessibility standards.

It may be worth pointing out that there are competing needs here.   What you 
are asking for is something called "responsive design," and this is generally 
done with a substantial amount of fancy css and a bit of javascript for 
flavor.   The alternative is those stupid mobile sites that don't actually 
work for your particular mobile device because they assume the wrong screen 
size.

Yep. But I'd leave the details about CSS and JS out of the SOW, and instead 
describe the desired behavior of the site.

The desire for a clean backend is a valid one, but in fact most of the time 
CMSs store this stuff in tables in a database, which are easily extracted if 
you want to migrate later.   There isn't a way to store web pages that 
doesn't require a bit of data analysis and transmogrification when you are 
upgrading—even a directory tree will have a layout that's specific to the 
particular deployment you have chosen.

So while I think the point you are making about that is a good one, it 
doesn't preclude CMSs that store information in databases—it just argues for 
the use of a CMS that does so in a way that's not needlessly complex and 
confusing.

Exactly.

Lars

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail