-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 04/16/2014 03:23 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
So, as a WG chair, a person known to me just tried to post to the
list From a brand new yahoo.com mail account. They aren't
subscribed with that address. I would normally just approve, and
add them...
It seems to me that I must now actually reject, because it would
affect other subscribers.
I'm now thinking that we need to remove all the @yahoo.com
addresses from posting to ietf mailing lists.
This is probably obvious, but had gmail.com done what yahoo.com
has done, that could I guess have a pretty significant impact on
the IETF getting stuff done for a while since a lot of folks in
the last few years seem to have migrated their IETF mail to
gmail.com as a reasonable way to get around corporate this-and-that
issues.
Maybe people who've done that might want to consider whether its
such a good plan for so many IETF participants to be dependent on
just one service now that we have a demonstration that s/none/reject/
in one TXT RR can have such an impact.
S.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTTle3AAoJEC88hzaAX42i7jQIALBIZ3Z+jp1RbGCiJp4IVztN
qWa0aEUcx2Skp4gtM/vQnEEsCjYFAnRaoMofJqyUBuvTs3H0q/GMkcONcOPJW6wH
R/HpKKr24UpYsfpdYKx99b7D27kVNgzML3e0bD3csR1MNC/yR7wvsnTHTwbv2mxk
eb7O5Wp6kvKw/gRYjPHncMPSgBUyc+KixY6IDHzDk4IdCQP4CyVkhI4EV7dlu8nM
T1RNhljdzCmJBLd0y1USS1UmKrPVhoFgBXShvnxabseqJN/m2bz5WVSuJgIwWRov
duU5vRgbdQ5jTn9TBzEPdJ5LRbQczlHyLVdnjvOHApQ8HtNrQxKOe89C0b32+7A=
=cS/m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----