Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)]
2014-06-18 10:45:54
Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
I am still looking for a calendar program written by someone who
understands that there are multiple time zones and that when I travel
from one time zone to another I probably want to get up at different
times etc without having the change affect appointments when I return.
Seriously, is it so difficult for someone to understand that when
setting a recurring appointment it is necessary to be able to specify
the time zone so that the correct daylight savings adjustments are made?
I gave up waiting for those features in Outlook after waiting ten
years. But they do indicate just how 'STUCK' software gets.
That's odd - time zones and daylight savings time just seem to work in
all the calendars that I use - (including Outlook and my out-of-the-box
Android smartphone)
As for being a low volume mail user, I am currently using 10Gb of my
15Gb free Gmail allowance. The reason I use Gmail to do my IETF mail
is that I can't wait half an hour for IMAP or POP to sync each time I
want to read mail.
I don't give my work email out nearly as often as my gmail account
which means that I get my corporate email in an acceptable length of time.
Hmmm.... my mailbox alone gets maybe 5000 emails a day - a lot of it
spam of course, but a lot of list traffic and admin messages (I'm
postmaster for our system as well as admin for a bunch of email
lists). The mail on my laptop client (SeaMonkey) and my smartphone are
pretty much always up to date, and if I boot my laptop cold, a few
thousand messages will update within a minute or so. If it takes you
half an hour to sync IMAP then you're doing something very wrong.
Miles Fidelman
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], (continued)
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Theodore Ts'o
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], John C Klensin
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Ted Lemon
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Tony Finch
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Ted Lemon
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], John C Klensin
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Scott Brim
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], John C Klensin
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)],
Miles Fidelman <=
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Hector Santos
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Hector Santos
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Hector Santos
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.), Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.), Mark Rousell
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.), Dave Crocker
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.), Alessandro Vesely
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Ted Lemon
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Miles Fidelman
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Hector Santos |
Next by Date: |
Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Hector Santos |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Phillip Hallam-Baker |
Next by Thread: |
Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Hector Santos |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|