| 
 
 Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)]
2014-06-18 10:45:54
 
Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
 
 I am still looking for a calendar program written by someone who 
understands that there are multiple time zones and that when I travel 
from one time zone to another I probably want to get up at different 
times etc without having the change affect appointments when I return.
 Seriously, is it so difficult for someone to understand that when 
setting a recurring appointment it is necessary to be able to specify 
the time zone so that the correct daylight savings adjustments are made?
 I gave up waiting for those features in Outlook after waiting ten 
years. But they do indicate just how 'STUCK' software gets.
 
 That's odd - time zones and daylight savings time just seem to work in 
all the calendars that I use -  (including Outlook and my out-of-the-box 
Android smartphone)
 
 As for being a low volume mail user, I am currently using 10Gb of my 
15Gb free Gmail allowance. The reason I use Gmail to do my IETF mail 
is that I can't wait half an hour for IMAP or POP to sync each time I 
want to read mail.
 I don't give my work email out nearly as often as my gmail account 
which means that I get my corporate email in an acceptable length of time.
 
 Hmmm.... my mailbox alone gets maybe 5000 emails a day - a lot of it 
spam of course, but a lot of list traffic and admin messages (I'm 
postmaster for our system as well as admin for a bunch of email 
lists).   The mail on my laptop client (SeaMonkey) and my smartphone are 
pretty much always up to date, and if I boot my laptop cold, a few 
thousand messages will update within a minute or so.  If it takes you 
half an hour to sync IMAP then you're doing something very wrong.
Miles Fidelman
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra
 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], (continued)
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Theodore Ts'o
 - Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Phillip Hallam-Baker
 
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], John C Klensin
 - Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Ted Lemon
 - Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Tony Finch
 - Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Ted Lemon
 
    
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], John C Klensin
 - Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Scott Brim
 - Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], John C Klensin
 - Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Phillip Hallam-Baker
 - Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)],
Miles Fidelman <=
 
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Hector Santos
 
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Hector Santos
 
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Hector Santos
 
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.), Phillip Hallam-Baker
 - Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.), Mark Rousell
 
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.), Dave Crocker
 
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture  (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.), Alessandro Vesely
 
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Ted Lemon
 
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Phillip Hallam-Baker
 
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Miles Fidelman
 
 
 |  
  
| Previous by Date:  | 
Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Hector Santos | 
 
| Next by Date:  | 
Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Hector Santos | 
 
| Previous by Thread:  | 
Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Phillip Hallam-Baker | 
 
| Next by Thread:  | 
Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Hector Santos | 
 
| Indexes:  | 
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] | 
 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 |