IETF Discussion (date)
June 27, 2014
- Re: draft list of qualified volunteers for 2014-2015 nomcom, Paul Ebersman, 15:45
- Re: econd draft list of qualified volunteers for 2014-2015 nomcom, Michael Richardson, 15:45
- Re: Fwd: econd draft list of qualified volunteers for 2014-2015 nomcom, Michael Richardson, 15:44
- [no subject], Michael Richardson, 15:43
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-netext-wifi-epc-eap-attributes-08, Koodli, Rajeev, 15:42
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Michael Richardson, 13:13
- Re: ietf.org now DNSSEC-bogus :-(, Dick Franks, 12:10
- Re: ietf.org now DNSSEC-bogus :-(, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 11:23
- Re: ietf.org now DNSSEC-bogus :-(, Shumon Huque, 09:58
- Re: ietf.org now DNSSEC-bogus :-(, Christopher Morrow, 09:51
- Re: ietf.org now DNSSEC-bogus :-(, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 06:02
- Re: ietf.org now DNSSEC-bogus :-(, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 05:53
- ietf.org now DNSSEC-bogus :-(, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 05:51
June 26, 2014
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: econd draft list of qualified volunteers for 2014-2015 nomcom, Thomas D. Nadeau, 13:54
- Re: econd draft list of qualified volunteers for 2014-2015 nomcom, Russ Housley, 13:03
- econd draft list of qualified volunteers for 2014-2015 nomcom, NomCom Chair 2014, 11:43
- Re: [v6ops] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6-05, Robert Sparks, 11:14
- draft list of qualified volunteers for 2014-2015 nomcom, NomCom Chair 2014, 11:10
- Re: [v6ops] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6-05, Jari Arkko, 11:05
June 25, 2014
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Masataka Ohta, 17:09
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Randy Bush, 16:42
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Dave Cridland, 15:57
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Niels Dettenbach (Syndicat.com), 15:55
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Martin Rex, 15:51
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Hector Santos, 14:53
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Dave Cridland, 14:27
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Fred Baker (fred), 14:04
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Martin Rex, 13:49
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Yoav Nir, 13:44
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Niels Dettenbach, 12:43
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Lee Howard, 12:26
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Dan Wing, 12:25
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Martin Rex, 12:24
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., joel jaeggli, 12:17
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Dan Wing, 12:09
- Re: The P in NAPT != Privacy was Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Ted Lemon, 11:37
- Re: The P in NAPT != Privacy was Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Fred Baker (fred), 11:29
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Thierry Moreau, 11:17
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Martin Rex, 10:40
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 07:26
- Re: The P in NAPT != Privacy was Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Jelte Jansen, 06:32
- Re: The P in NAPT != Privacy was Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Masataka Ohta, 06:10
- Re: The P in NAPT != Privacy was Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Jelte Jansen, 04:58
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Masataka Ohta, 04:51
- Re: The P in NAPT != Privacy was Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Floris Van den Abeele, 03:45
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-netext-wifi-epc-eap-attributes-08, Peter Yee, 02:10
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ipfix-text-adt-06, Brian Trammell, 01:16
- The P in NAPT != Privacy was Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Brian Trammell, 00:55
June 24, 2014
- RE: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Michel Py, 23:28
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Ted Lemon, 22:44
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Randy Bush, 22:36
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Ted Lemon, 22:26
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Randy Bush, 22:20
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Ted Lemon, 22:03
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Brian E Carpenter, 20:08
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Mark Andrews, 19:57
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 19:26
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., David Farmer, 19:17
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Martin Rex, 18:56
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Mark Andrews, 18:45
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Dave Cridland, 17:50
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Martin Rex, 17:05
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ipfix-text-adt-06, Black, David, 16:42
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Gary Mulder, 16:26
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ipfix-text-adt-05, Black, David, 16:23
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Carsten Bormann, 15:07
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 14:28
- Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:41
June 23, 2014
- Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-kelsey-intarea-mesh-link-establishment-06, Ben Campbell, 14:32
- IETF 90 Preliminary Agenda, IETF Agenda, 14:18
- Re: second call: NomCom 2014-2015 Call for Volunteers, Michael Richardson, 12:40
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-dtls-03, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 12:39
- RE: [Internetgovtech] Status of selection of IANA NTIA transition representatives by the IESG, Jefsey, 12:39
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Status of selection of IANA NTIA transition representatives by the IESG, Jefsey, 12:38
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-dtls-03, Roni Even, 12:05
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-dtls-03, Roni Even, 08:29
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ipfix-text-adt-05, Brian Trammell, 02:57
June 18, 2014
- Re: RFP: IETF Website Revamp, Andy Bierman, 19:39
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.), Mark Rousell, 15:25
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Hector Santos, 12:25
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Miles Fidelman, 10:45
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Hector Santos, 10:30
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:13
- Re: RFP: IETF Website Revamp, John C Klensin, 09:12
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], John C Klensin, 08:12
- IETF-90 BoFs, IETF Chair, 02:06
June 17, 2014
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Hector Santos, 15:56
- Re: RFP: IETF Website Revamp, Brian E Carpenter, 15:14
- Re: RFP: IETF Website Revamp, Randy Presuhn, 11:59
- Re: RFP: IETF Website Revamp, Russ Housley, 11:58
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Scott Brim, 11:39
- Re: RFP: IETF Website Revamp, Toerless Eckert, 11:16
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], John C Klensin, 10:52
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Ted Lemon, 10:25
- RFP: IMAP Server, IETF Administrative Director, 10:06
- RFP: IETF Website Revamp, IETF Administrative Director, 10:05
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Tony Finch, 09:13
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Ted Lemon, 08:31
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], John C Klensin, 08:27
June 16, 2014
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Phillip Hallam-Baker, 20:39
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Theodore Ts'o, 18:56
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Stephen Casner, 16:33
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Brian E Carpenter, 15:49
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], ned+ietf, 13:41
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Eric Burger, 13:14
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-encrypt-then-mac-02.txt> (Encrypt-then-MAC for TLS and DTLS) to Proposed Standard, Martin Rex, 10:35
- third call: NomCom 2014-2015 Call for Volunteers, Michael Richardson, 09:33
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Brandon Long, 09:33
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ipfix-text-adt-05, Benoit Claise, 04:56
June 14, 2014
- Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-mmusic-rtsp-nat-evaluation-14, Black, David, 21:57
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], ned+ietf, 15:40
- email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Brian E Carpenter, 15:15
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.), Dave Crocker, 13:09
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.), Alessandro Vesely, 10:31
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:26
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.), ned+ietf, 09:50
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.), Miles Fidelman, 09:40
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:02
- Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.), Dave Crocker, 02:17
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., John C Klensin, 01:49
June 13, 2014
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Joe Abley, 19:02
- third call: NomCom 2014-2015 Call for Volunteers (version 2.0), Michael Richardson, 13:50
- [no subject], Michael Richardson, 13:26
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Miles Fidelman, 13:06
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:58
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Stephen J. Turnbull, 10:06
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Tony Finch, 10:04
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:00
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Ted Lemon, 08:51
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Tony Finch, 08:42
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 07:18
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Miles Fidelman, 06:55
June 12, 2014
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:54
- RE: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-smp-requirements-06.txt, Jeong Ryoo, 20:14
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Miles Fidelman, 14:03
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice, S Moonesamy, 13:56
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:33
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:17
- Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-enhanced-route-refresh-08, Peter Yee, 11:15
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Ted Lemon, 10:19
- RE: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-smp-requirements-06.txt, Zhenlong Cui, 10:14
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Ted Lemon, 10:05
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., John C Klensin, 09:50
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Dave Crocker, 09:21
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 07:47
June 10, 2014
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-encrypt-then-mac-02.txt> (Encrypt-then-MAC for TLS and DTLS) to Proposed Standard, Yoav Nir, 15:00
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-netext-wifi-epc-eap-attributes-08.txt> (EAP Attributes for WiFi - EPC Integration) to Informational RFC, Donald Eastlake, 14:37
- Call for Volunteers for Liaison Manager to ECMA TC39, Hago Dafalla, 12:17
- Re: [Gen-art] Ge-ART LC review of draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-06, Jari Arkko, 10:24
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-enhanced-route-refresh-06, Jari Arkko, 10:23
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-encrypt-then-mac-02.txt> (Encrypt-then-MAC for TLS and DTLS) to Proposed Standard, Hugo Krawczyk, 10:22
- Re: RFC compliance and the European Parliament, Olaf Kolkman, 02:51
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-encrypt-then-mac-02.txt> (Encrypt-then-MAC for TLS and DTLS) to Proposed Standard, Yoav Nir, 02:45
- Re: RFC compliance and the European Parliament, Olaf Kolkman, 02:44
- Re: RFC compliance and the European Parliament, Roger Jørgensen, 02:07
- RE: RFC compliance and the European Parliament, JOSEFSSON Erik, 00:41
June 09, 2014
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-smp-requirements-05.txt> (Requirements for MPLS-TP Shared Mesh Protection), Jeong Ryoo, 19:31
- RE: RFC compliance and the European Parliament, Jaldora Kyor, 16:03
- RE: RFC compliance and the European Parliament, S Moonesamy, 15:27
- RE: RFC compliance and the European Parliament, JOSEFSSON Erik, 14:40
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Coordination Group Members for the Transition of NTIA's Stewardship of the IANA Functions, Christian de Larrinaga, 11:38
- Re: RFC compliance and the European Parliament, S Moonesamy, 11:05
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-smp-requirements-05.txt> (Requirements for MPLS-TP Shared Mesh Protection) to Informational RFC, Adrian Farrel, 09:27
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Coordination Group Members for the Transition of NTIA's Stewardship of the IANA Functions, Roger Jørgensen, 05:02
- Re: Coordination Group Members for the Transition of NTIA's Stewardship of the IANA Functions, S Moonesamy, 03:15
June 08, 2014
- Re: Next IETF Meeting DMARC Related Talks, Dave Crocker, 15:21
- Re: Next IETF Meeting DMARC Related Talks, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10:42
- Re: Next IETF Meeting DMARC Related Talks, John C Klensin, 10:41
- Re: Next IETF Meeting DMARC Related Talks, Dave Crocker, 01:52
- Re: Next IETF Meeting DMARC Related Talks, John C Klensin, 01:33
June 07, 2014
- Re: Next IETF Meeting DMARC Related Talks, Murray S. Kucherawy, 23:35
- Next IETF Meeting DMARC Related Talks, Hector Santos, 16:59
- Re: Coordination Group Members for the Transition of NTIA's Stewardship of the IANA Functions, John C Klensin, 10:50
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-encrypt-then-mac-02.txt> (Encrypt-then-MAC for TLS and DTLS) to Proposed Standard, Yoav Nir, 08:15
- Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 07:41
- AUTO: Ahmed Bakhat Masood is out of the office. (returning 06/14/2014), Ahmed Bakhat Masood, 06:17
- Re: Coordination Group Members for the Transition of NTIA's Stewardship of the IANA Functions, Jari Arkko, 01:49
June 06, 2014
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a mailing list?, Doyle, John, 17:33
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-enhanced-route-refresh-06, Keyur Patel (keyupate), 14:55
- Re: Coordination Group Members for the Transition of NTIA's Stewardship of the IANA Functions, manning bill, 12:59
- RE: [Internet Policy] Fwd: Re: root justification for net neutrality?, Richard Shockey, 12:19
- Re: Mailing List reminders, t.p., 09:01
- Re: Google to Host IETF 92 in Dallas!, marcie, 01:46
June 05, 2014
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Coordination Group Members for the Transition of NTIA's Stewardship of the IANA Functions, IETF Chair, 19:04
- Re: Mailing List reminders, Alexa Morris, 16:01
- Re: Mailing List reminders, Brian E Carpenter, 15:16
- Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6-05, Robert Sparks, 14:01
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-enhanced-route-refresh-06, Peter Yee, 13:38
- Re: [Internet Policy] root justification for net neutrality?, Michael Richardson, 13:17
- Re: [Internet Policy] root justification for net neutrality?, Yoav Nir, 12:41
- Re: WG Review: Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments (ace), Rene Struik, 10:19
- Re: Mailing List reminders, Paul, 10:19
- Re: [Internet Policy] root justification for net neutrality?, Nick Ashton-Hart, 10:18
- RE: [nvo3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-06.txt> (Framework for DC Network Virtualization) to Informational RFC, LASSERRE, MARC (MARC), 10:17
- Re: [Internet Policy] root justification for net neutrality?, CW Mail, 10:09
- Re: [Internet Policy] Fwd: Re: root justification for net neutrality?, Clyde C McElroy, 10:08
- Re: [Internet Policy] Fwd: Re: root justification for net neutrality?, Clyde C McElroy, 10:08
- Google to Host IETF 92 in Dallas!, IETF Administrative Director, 10:07
- Re: [Internet Policy] Fwd: Re: root justification for net neutrality?, 6Advocate ., 10:06
- Re: [Internet Policy] Fwd: Re: root justification for net neutrality?, Evan Leibovitch, 10:05
- Re: [Internet Policy] root justification for net neutrality?, Evan Leibovitch, 10:05
- Re: [Internet Policy] Fwd: Re: root justification for net neutrality?, Evan Leibovitch, 10:04
- Re: Mailing List reminders, David Morris, 09:02
- BOF requests due tomorrow, IETF Chair, 08:32
- Re: Mailing List reminders, Miles Fidelman, 06:58
- Re: Mailing List reminders, Alessandro Vesely, 06:16
- Mailing List reminders, t.p., 03:54
- Re: [Internet Policy] Fwd: Re: root justification for net neutrality?, Patrik Fältström, 02:40
June 04, 2014
- Re[2]: [Internet Policy] Fwd: Re: root justification for net neutrality?, mohammed serrhini, 18:53
- Re: [Internet Policy] Fwd: Re: root justification for net neutrality?, Ofer Inbar, 12:12
- Re: [Internet Policy] Fwd: Re: root justification for net neutrality?, Ofer Inbar, 11:13
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Nfvrg -- Network Function Virtualization Research Group (NFVRG) discussion list, Dave Crocker, 10:26
- RE: New Non-WG Mailing List: Nfvrg -- Network Function Virtualization Research Group (NFVRG) discussion list, ramki Krishnan, 10:06
- Re: [Internet Policy] Fwd: Re: root justification for net neutrality?, Clyde C McElroy, 10:05
- Re: [Internet Policy] Fwd: Re: root justification for net neutrality?, Evan Leibovitch, 10:04
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Nfvrg -- Network Function Virtualization Research Group (NFVRG) discussion list, Eggert, Lars, 00:25
June 03, 2014
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Nfvrg -- Network Function Virtualization Research Group (NFVRG) discussion list, Dave Crocker, 16:00
- second call: NomCom 2014-2015 Call for Volunteers, Michael Richardson, 14:18
- [Internet Policy] root justification for net neutrality?, Louis Pouzin (well), 12:48
- RE: [nvo3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-06.txt> (Framework for DC Network Virtualization) to Informational RFC, LASSERRE, MARC (MARC), 10:11
- RE: [nvo3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-06.txt> (Framework for DC Network Virtualization) to Informational RFC, LASSERRE, MARC (MARC), 10:10
- Re: [nvo3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-06.txt> (Framework for DC Network Virtualization) to Informational RFC, Alia Atlas, 08:32
June 02, 2014
- Re: [nvo3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-06.txt> (Framework for DC Network Virtualization) to Informational RFC, Alia Atlas, 13:59
- Re: [nvo3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-06.txt> (Framework for DC Network Virtualization) to Informational RFC, Barry Leiba, 13:55
- Re: [nvo3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-06.txt> (Framework for DC Network Virtualization) to Informational RFC, Thomas Narten, 13:48
- RE: [nvo3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-06.txt> (Framework for DC Network Virtualization) to Informational RFC, Black, David, 13:45
- Re: [nvo3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-06.txt> (Framework for DC Network Virtualization) to Informational RFC, Barry Leiba, 13:31
- Re: Internet 2020 Goals, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 12:52
- Re: [nvo3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-06.txt> (Framework for DC Network Virtualization) to Informational RFC, Thomas Narten, 12:36
- Re: Internet 2020 Goals, Joe Touch, 12:04
- Multiple equivalent P-CSCF discovery issues, Bourdoukis Dimitrios, 11:00
- Re: [Internet Policy] Fwd: Re: root justification for net neutrality?, Niels Dettenbach (Syndicat IT&Internet), 10:50
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01, Uri Blumenthal, 09:47
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01, Stephen Farrell, 09:46
- LLN Plugfest at IETF 90, Ines Robles, 09:46
- Re: [Internet Policy] Fwd: Re: root justification for net neutrality?, Kelvin Githira, 09:43
- Re: [Internet Policy] Fwd: Re: root justification for net neutrality?, Arnaud AMELINA, 09:35
- Re: Fwd: Re: [Internet Policy] root justification for net neutrality?, Niels Dettenbach, 09:31