Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet

On Tue, 17 Jun 2014, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

I believe I am in a tiny, tiny minority by running my email
client in 'plain text' mode unless I receive a message that is
incomprehensible without setting 'original html' mode.


I'm with you there.

                                                        -- Steve

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., (continued) Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC., Phillip Hallam-Baker Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.), Dave Crocker Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.), Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.), Miles Fidelman Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.), ned+ietf email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Brian E Carpenter Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], ned+ietf Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Eric Burger Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], ned+ietf Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Brian E Carpenter Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Stephen Casner <= Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Theodore Ts'o Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], John C Klensin Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Ted Lemon Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Tony Finch Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Ted Lemon Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], John C Klensin Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Scott Brim Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], John C Klensin Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)], Phillip Hallam-Baker

Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)]