Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet.

ietf

Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet.

2014-06-30 07:41:28

On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:19 PM, <l(_dot_)wood(_at_)surrey(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk> 
wrote:

So NAPT (32bit IPv4 address + necessary 16-bit send/receive ports) must be
64 bit?

Its 64 bits the same way that paged memory gave you a 32 bit address space

on 16 bit chips.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: The P in NAPT != Privacy was Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., (continued) Re: The P in NAPT != Privacy was Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Jelte Jansen Re: The P in NAPT != Privacy was Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Masataka Ohta Re: The P in NAPT != Privacy was Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Jelte Jansen Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Lee Howard RE: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Michel Py Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Hector Santos Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Masataka Ohta Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Michael Richardson RE: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., l.wood Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Phillip Hallam-Baker <=

Previous by Date:	RE: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., l.wood
Next by Date:	third draft list of qualified volunteers for 2014-2015 nomcom, NomCom Chair 2014
Previous by Thread:	RE: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., l.wood
Next by Thread:	Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ipfix-text-adt-06, Black, David
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]