Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet.


Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill(_at_)hallambaker(_dot_)com> wrote:
    > So lets stop asking ISPs 'do you support IPv6' and instead ask 'Is your
    > Internet service 32 bit or 128'?

Good idea.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

pgpE62idpnBf6.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: The P in NAPT != Privacy was Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., (continued) Re: The P in NAPT != Privacy was Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Fred Baker (fred) Re: The P in NAPT != Privacy was Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Ted Lemon Re: The P in NAPT != Privacy was Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Jelte Jansen Re: The P in NAPT != Privacy was Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Masataka Ohta Re: The P in NAPT != Privacy was Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Jelte Jansen Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Lee Howard RE: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Michel Py Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Hector Santos Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Masataka Ohta Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Michael Richardson <= RE: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., l.wood Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Phillip Hallam-Baker