Re: The P in NAPT != Privacy was Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Inte

On Jun 25, 2014, at 1:45 AM, Floris Van den Abeele 
<floris(_dot_)vandenabeele(_at_)intec(_dot_)ugent(_dot_)be> wrote:

> FWIW, in Flanders (Northern region of Belgium) the two largest ISPs
> (Telenet and Belgacom) have been enabling IPv6 for their customers for
> the last year or so. Unfortunately, this only includes residential
> customers that got the latest CPE model (though luck if you're stuck
> with an older model). In the case of Telenet (monopoly ISP on HFC
> network) every customer gets a /56 subnet.
We also see measurable growth in traffic and deployment.

Eric put together some graphs of Ipv6 growth, using Google data. It attempts to 
project traffic level a year hence, with obvious dependency on the regression 
model. You may find it interesting to poke around in. An “IPv6-enabled web 
browser” is a web browser that exchanges data with Google using IPv6, and 
implies not only the browser and laptop, but intervening network.

An interesting comparison regarding “a year hence” is the range between the 
logistic curve prediction and the quadratic projection; where it’s actually 
going to be is probably bracketed by those numbers. Take some time poking 
around.

https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/project.php?metric=p&timeforward=&timebackward=&country=be
https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/project.php?metric=p&timeforward=&timebackward=&country=us
https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/project.php?metric=p&timeforward=&timebackward=&country=de
https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/project.php?metric=p&timeforward=&timebackward=&country=ww

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail