Re: Registration policies (was: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authenti

assignment guidance is for people to contact the IETF to request an
assignment in that registry.  From the IETF side they would be some
commitment to review the request.


No.  IETF Review means that the request has to be made from an IETF
Stream document.  Such a document is being reviewed by the IETF
anyway, and the registry adds no extra work.

Barry

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), (continued) Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Dave Crocker Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), S Moonesamy Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Dave Crocker Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), S Moonesamy Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Barry Leiba Message not available Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), S Moonesamy Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Barry Leiba Message not available Registration policies (was: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)), S Moonesamy Re: Registration policies (was: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)), Barry Leiba Message not available Re: Registration policies (was: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)), S Moonesamy Re: Registration policies (was: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)), Barry Leiba <= Re: Registration policies (was: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)), Murray S. Kucherawy Re: Registration policies (was: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)), Barry Leiba Re: Registration policies (was: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)), Murray S. Kucherawy Message not available [SPAM] Re: Registration policies (was: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)), S Moonesamy Re: [SPAM] Re: Registration policies (was: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)), Barry Leiba Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Martin Rex Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Dave Crocker Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x, Martin Rex Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x, John Levine Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x, John C Klensin

Re: Registration policies (was: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc))