IETF Discussion (date)
July 31, 2014
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF wireless network), Randall Gellens, 23:50
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF wireless network), Randall Gellens, 23:47
- Re: OpenSource vs. IETF Standards, Brian E Carpenter, 23:02
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Martin Rex, 18:30
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Viktor Dukhovni, 17:33
- Re: Fwd: OpenSource vs. IETF Standards, S Moonesamy, 16:58
- Re: Fwd: OpenSource vs. IETF Standards, Pete Resnick, 16:32
- Re: OpenSource vs. IETF Standards, Kathleen Moriarty, 16:05
- Re: OpenSource vs. IETF Standards, manning bill, 15:51
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, t.p., 15:29
- Re: OpenSource vs. IETF Standards, Brian E Carpenter, 15:13
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Stephen Kent, 14:39
- Re: OpenSource vs. IETF Standards, manning bill, 12:40
- Re: Fwd: OpenSource vs. IETF Standards, Randy Bush, 11:52
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Martin Thomson, 11:45
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Henry B Hotz, 11:45
- Re: OpenSource vs. IETF Standards, Ted Lemon, 11:33
- Fwd: OpenSource vs. IETF Standards, Massimiliano Pala, 11:27
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, t.p., 06:40
July 30, 2014
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Viktor Dukhovni, 23:16
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-05.txt> (Congestion Control Requirements For RMCAT) to Informational RFC, John Leslie, 21:37
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Stephen Kent, 15:16
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Viktor Dukhovni, 12:38
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Viktor Dukhovni, 12:32
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Stephen Kent, 10:54
- Juniper to Host IETF 96 in Berlin!, IETF Administrative Director, 10:18
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Viktor Dukhovni, 10:09
July 28, 2014
- Re: IETF 91 T-shirt / Badge suggestion, Klaas Wierenga (kwiereng), 10:37
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Tim Bray, 10:35
- Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Sam Hartman, 10:21
- Re: IETF 91 T-shirt / Badge suggestion, Mary Barnes, 10:19
- Re: IETF 91 T-shirt / Badge suggestion, Rob Evans, 10:00
July 25, 2014
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Viktor Dukhovni, 20:43
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Dave Crocker, 17:22
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF wireless network), Niels Dettenbach (Syndicat IT&Internet), 14:32
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF wireless network), Randall Gellens, 14:25
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF wireless network), Randall Gellens, 14:03
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF wireless network), Samuel Weiler, 11:28
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network, Stefan Winter, 10:39
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network, Stefan Winter, 10:32
- Re: SIGCOMM and IETF work RE: v6 adoption, Mark Allman, 10:28
- SIGCOMM and IETF work RE: v6 adoption, Aaron Yi DING, 10:27
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network, John Levine, 10:05
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-dname-04, Roni Even, 10:02
- Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-06, Black, David, 09:46
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network, Bill Fenner, 09:37
- Re: If I may inquire, what exactly does the IETF Organization stand for? Acronym aside. What is the goal? Who are you people?, Yoav Nir, 09:33
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network, Bill Fenner, 09:30
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network, Brian E Carpenter, 09:24
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network, Stefan Winter, 09:22
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network, George Michaelson, 09:19
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network, Bill Fenner, 09:13
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF wireless network), Stefan Winter, 09:11
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF wireless network), John C Klensin, 09:06
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF wireless network), George Michaelson, 08:57
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF wireless network), Steve Crocker, 08:44
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF wireless network), joel jaeggli, 08:40
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF wireless network), Steve Crocker, 08:34
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF wireless network), John C Klensin, 08:30
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network, Stefan Winter, 08:12
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network, Stefan Winter, 08:11
- Re: [90all] Security for the IETF wireless network, Randy Bush, 08:05
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network, Tim Wicinski, 07:54
- Re: If I may inquire, what exactly does the IETF Organization stand for? Acronym aside. What is the goal? Who are you people?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 07:40
- Re: [90all] Security for the IETF wireless network, Randall Gellens, 07:37
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network, joel jaeggli, 07:31
- Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF wireless network), Steve Crocker, 07:09
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network, George, Wes, 06:59
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network, George, Wes, 06:46
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNWG proposal is a terribly bad idea, Masataka Ohta, 03:34
- Re: If I may inquire, what exactly does the IETF Organization stand for? Acronym aside. What is the goal? Who are you people?, Donald Eastlake, 00:19
- If I may inquire, what exactly does the IETF Organization stand for? Acronym aside. What is the goal? Who are you people?, marcie, 00:03
July 24, 2014
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Hector Santos, 23:37
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Avri Doria, 22:40
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network, Brian E Carpenter, 15:58
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Brian E Carpenter, 15:11
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Yoav Nir, 13:28
- Clueless (was: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), S Moonesamy, 13:17
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 12:54
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 12:43
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Ted Lemon, 12:30
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Pete Resnick, 12:22
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Brian E Carpenter, 11:51
- v6 adoption, Mark Allman, 11:47
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Michael Richardson, 10:17
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Miles Fidelman, 09:51
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:41
July 23, 2014
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Abdussalam Baryun, 23:34
- Re: volunteers for taking notes, Jari Arkko, 13:11
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNWG proposal is a terribly bad idea, Eric Travis, 12:58
- RE: [dtn-interest] DTNWG proposal is a terribly bad idea, Tom Chaffee, 12:57
- RE: [dtn-interest] DTNWG proposal is a terribly bad idea, l.wood, 07:40
July 22, 2014
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNWG proposal is a terribly bad idea, Vint Cerf, 23:33
- RE: [dtn-interest] DTNWG proposal is a terribly bad idea, l.wood, 21:22
- Re: Suggestion - unified plenary audience queue, Jari Arkko, 16:55
- Re: Suggestion - unified plenary audience queue, Stephen Casner, 16:29
- Re: Suggestion - unified plenary audience queue, Alia Atlas, 16:28
- Re: Suggestion - unified plenary audience queue, Eggert, Lars, 16:24
- Re: DMARC and ietf.org, John Levine, 16:16
- Suggestion - unified plenary audience queue, Dave Crocker, 16:03
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Scott Brim, 15:05
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Pete Resnick, 14:52
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, John W Noerenberg II, 14:41
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Michael StJohns, 14:32
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Eliot Lear, 14:28
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Michael StJohns, 14:22
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:21
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Ted Lemon, 13:46
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Chris Elliott, 13:36
- Re: [video-codec] royalty free video codec discussion at IETF 90 - Manitoba room, Tues 1130-1250, Timothy B. Terriberry, 13:27
- Re: [video-codec] royalty free video codec discussion at IETF 90 - Manitoba room, Tues 1130-1250, Jari Arkko, 13:19
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Ted Lemon, 12:29
- Re: DMARC and ietf.org, Hector Santos, 12:28
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Dave Crocker, 12:25
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, James Woodyatt, 12:24
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Pete Resnick, 12:17
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Andrew Sullivan, 12:15
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Spencer Dawkins, 12:13
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Michael StJohns, 12:10
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, IETF Chair, 12:09
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Michael StJohns, 12:07
- Re: Volunteers for the 2015 ICANN Nominating Committee, Hassan Zaheer, 12:06
- Re: [video-codec] royalty free video codec discussion at IETF 90 - Manitoba room, Tues 1130-1250, Emil Ivov, 12:06
- Re: [video-codec] royalty free video codec discussion at IETF 90 - Manitoba room, Tues 1130-1250, Jack Moffitt, 12:05
- Re: DTNWG proposal is a terribly bad idea, Vint Cerf, 12:04
- Re: [video-codec] royalty free video codec discussion at IETF 90 - Manitoba room, Tues 1130-1250, Jack Moffitt, 12:04
- RE: [video-codec] royalty free video codec discussion at IETF 90 - Manitoba room, Tues 1130-1250, Paul Coverdale, 12:03
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability-07, Kamran Raza (skraza), 12:03
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Brian E Carpenter, 11:40
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Stephen Farrell, 11:36
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Jari Arkko, 11:33
- Re: WG Review: Transport Services (taps), Scott O. Bradner, 11:28
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Andrew Sullivan, 11:23
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Hector Santos, 11:22
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, IETF Chair, 11:16
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:13
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas D. Nadeau, 11:08
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, ned+ietf, 11:06
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Michael StJohns, 10:21
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, manning bill, 10:14
- Re: Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Ted Hardie, 09:40
- Moderation on ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, IETF Chair, 09:25
- volunteers for taking notes, Jari Arkko, 08:38
- Re: DMARC and ietf.org, Viktor Dukhovni, 08:31
- Re: DTNWG proposal is a terribly bad idea, Pete Resnick, 08:30
- Last Call conduct redux (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard), Pete Resnick, 08:28
- Re: DMARC and ietf.org, Hector Santos, 07:45
July 21, 2014
- Re: BCP56 - WG Review: Transport Services (taps), Toerless Eckert, 22:04
- RE: DMARC and ietf.org, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 15:40
- Re: DMARC and ietf.org, Hector Santos, 15:24
- RE: DMARC and ietf.org, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 14:18
- Re: DMARC and ietf.org, Hector Santos, 14:10
- IPROC team and IANA, IETF Chair, 12:43
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, John Levine, 12:09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Viktor Dukhovni, 10:15
- Re: Volunteers for the 2015 ICANN Nominating Committee, IAB Chair, 09:39
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Douglas Otis, 08:26
July 20, 2014
- Re: DMARC and ietf.org, John Levine, 21:52
- Re: DMARC and ietf.org, Martin Rex, 16:42
- [no subject], Bobboyi, 16:29
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Martin Rex, 16:19
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Hector Santos, 15:02
- Re: DMARC and ietf.org, Dave Crocker, 14:04
- Re: DMARC and ietf.org, Pete Resnick, 13:54
- Re: DMARC and ietf.org, Miles Fidelman, 13:53
- Re: DMARC and ietf.org, Brian E Carpenter, 13:39
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Eric Burger, 13:24
- Re: DTNWG proposal is a terribly bad idea, Abdussalam Baryun, 12:20
- Re: DMARC and ietf.org, Miles Fidelman, 12:09
- Re: DMARC and ietf.org, Hector Santos, 11:45
- Re: DMARC and ietf.org, Brian E Carpenter, 11:24
- Re: DMARC and ietf.org, John C Klensin, 11:13
- Re: [tram] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tram-auth-problems-02.txt> (Problems with STUN long-term Authentication for TURN) to Informational RFC, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 11:11
- Re: [***SPAM***] Re: Registration policies (was: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)), Barry Leiba, 10:10
- Re: DMARC and ietf.org, Brian E Carpenter, 09:04
- DMARC and ietf.org, Michael Richardson, 08:27
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), S Moonesamy, 03:17
July 19, 2014
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Douglas Otis, 23:28
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Ted Lemon, 16:33
- Re: DTNWG proposal is a terribly bad idea, Avri Doria, 15:28
- Re: BCP56 - WG Review: Transport Services (taps), Brian Trammell, 14:42
- Re: BCP56 - WG Review: Transport Services (taps), Spencer Dawkins, 13:52
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x, John Levine, 13:09
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNWG proposal is a terribly bad idea, Nabil Benamar, 12:25
- royalty free video codec discussion at IETF 90 - Manitoba room, Tues 1130-1250, Jack Moffitt, 12:24
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Nico Williams, 12:23
- Re: [dtn-interest] DTNWG proposal is a terribly bad idea, Vint Cerf, 12:23
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 11:09
- Re: summary for Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A Null MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf, 10:09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 10:02
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, John R Levine, 09:50
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 09:40
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Viktor Dukhovni, 09:25
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Douglas Otis, 09:03
- Re: summary for Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A Null MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Tony Finch, 08:10
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x, Randy Bush, 03:32
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 03:19
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x, Stuart Barkley, 02:57
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Viktor Dukhovni, 00:59
July 18, 2014
- DTNWG proposal is a terribly bad idea, l.wood, 22:29
- Re: summary for Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A Null MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Viktor Dukhovni, 20:53
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Viktor Dukhovni, 19:47
- Re: summary for Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A Null MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf, 19:27
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews, 19:10
- Re: summary for Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A Null MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Tony Finch, 16:46
- Re: summary for Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A Null MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf, 16:27
- Re: summary for Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A Null MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Tony Finch, 15:34
- Re: summary for Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A Null MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf, 15:20
- Re: summary for Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A Null MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, John R Levine, 14:52
- Re: summary for Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A Null MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Tony Finch, 14:43
- Re: summary for Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A Null MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Dave Cridland, 14:40
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:32
- Re: summary for Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A Null MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, John R Levine, 14:25
- Re: WG Review: Transport Services (taps), Toerless Eckert, 13:15
- Re: summary for Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A Null MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf, 13:11
- summary for Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A Null MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, John Levine, 12:51
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Martin Rex, 12:49
- Re: BCP56 - WG Review: Transport Services (taps), Toerless Eckert, 12:45
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Hector Santos, 11:42
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Hector Santos, 10:59
- Re: [IPFIX] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipfix-text-adt-07.txt> (Textual Representation of IPFIX Abstract Data Types) to Proposed Standard, Paul Aitken, 10:57
- Re: [IPFIX] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipfix-text-adt-07.txt> (Textual Representation of IPFIX Abstract Data Types) to Proposed Standard, Paul Aitken, 10:57
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Hector Santos, 10:16
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf, 10:15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Ted Lemon, 10:08
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 10:07
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Nico Williams, 10:02
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Nico Williams, 10:02
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Ted Lemon, 09:51
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Ted Lemon, 09:50
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Ted Lemon, 09:48
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 09:48
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, John Levine, 09:45
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-dname-04.txt> (AS112 Redirection using DNAME) to Informational RFC, Tony Finch, 09:36
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), ned+ietf, 09:33
- Re: WG Review: Transport Services (taps), Abdussalam Baryun, 09:03
- Re: [90attendees] Hints on best airport transfer someone?, Victor Kuarsingh, 08:26
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Tony Finch, 07:43
- Re: WG Review: Transport Services (taps), Stewart Bryant, 07:37
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 07:11
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 06:58
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Ted Lemon, 06:52
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Tony Finch, 05:54
- [***SPAM***] Re: Registration policies (was: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)), S Moonesamy, 02:23
July 17, 2014
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, John Levine, 23:07
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 22:40
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews, 22:26
- RE: Missing mail archives, l.wood, 22:13
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 22:11
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 21:51
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ipfix-text-adt-07, Black, David, 20:35
- Re: Reviving watersprings.org., John Levine, 20:12
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 20:09
- Re: Registration policies (was: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)), Murray S. Kucherawy, 20:08
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Viktor Dukhovni, 20:02
- Re: Registration policies (was: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)), Barry Leiba, 19:40
- Re: Registration policies (was: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)), Murray S. Kucherawy, 19:35
- Re: Registration policies (was: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)), Barry Leiba, 19:13
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Sandy Wills, 18:57
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews, 18:35
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 17:49
- Re: Registration policies (was: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)), S Moonesamy, 17:31
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 16:38
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Pete Resnick, 16:37
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Murray S. Kucherawy, 16:24
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 16:03
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x, Pete Resnick, 15:40
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x, Dave Crocker, 15:29
- Re: Reviving watersprings.org., Joe Touch, 15:25
- Re: [IPFIX] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipfix-text-adt-07.txt> (Textual Representation of IPFIX Abstract Data Types) to Proposed Standard, Brian Trammell, 15:17
- Re: Registration policies (was: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)), Barry Leiba, 15:08
- Registration policies (was: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)), S Moonesamy, 15:05
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Martin Rex, 14:57
- Re: Missing mail archives, Martin Rex, 14:26
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x, John R Levine, 14:13
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Barry Leiba, 14:13
- Re: Reviving watersprings.org., Martin Rex, 14:12
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x, John C Klensin, 14:12
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x, John C Klensin, 14:11
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05.txt> (A NULL MX Resource Record for Domains that Accept No Mail) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 14:10
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), S Moonesamy, 14:09
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x, Dave Crocker, 09:42
- Re: [IPFIX] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipfix-text-adt-07.txt> (Textual Representation of IPFIX Abstract Data Types) to Proposed Standard, Brian Trammell, 09:41
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x, John C Klensin, 09:31
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Barry Leiba, 09:17
- Re: Reviving watersprings.org., Fred Baker (fred), 08:22
- Re: Reviving watersprings.org., Fred Baker (fred), 08:16
- RE: Security review of draft-ietf-pce-questions-06, Adrian Farrel, 06:58
- Welcome to IETF-90!, IETF Chair, 05:14
- Re: Reviving watersprings.org., Randy Bush, 04:30
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), S Moonesamy, 01:10
- Re: FYI for friends of the late Evi Nemeth, manning bill, 00:31
July 16, 2014
- Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-05, Black, David, 23:39
- Re: Reviving watersprings.org., Brian E Carpenter, 23:36
- FYI for friends of the late Evi Nemeth, Brian E Carpenter, 23:31
- Re: Reviving watersprings.org., manning bill, 23:16
- Re: Reviving watersprings.org., Brian E Carpenter, 23:00
- Missing mail archives, Dean Willis, 22:27
- Re: Reviving watersprings.org., manning bill, 22:09
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x, John Levine, 21:47
- Re: Reviving watersprings.org., Dean Willis, 21:30
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Randy Bush, 21:28
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x, Martin Rex, 21:20
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Dave Crocker, 20:43
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Martin Rex, 20:16
- RE: Security review of draft-ietf-pce-questions-06, Eric Gray, 20:15
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Dave Crocker, 19:34
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), S Moonesamy, 19:24
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Dave Crocker, 18:03
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), S Moonesamy, 14:22
- Re: Reviving watersprings.org., Warren Kumari, 13:05
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Pete Resnick, 12:43
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Hector Santos, 11:52
- Re: [paws] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-paws-protocol-12, Vincent Chen, 11:06
- Re: not really to do with Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Hector Santos, 10:30
- Re: [90attendees] Hints on best airport transfer someone?, Robert Moskowitz, 10:09
- ** Applications Open for ISOC Fellowship to IETF 91 (Honolulu) **, Niel Harper, 10:07
- RE: Gen-ART Last Call Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-06, Lucy yong, 10:05
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Dave Crocker, 10:04
- Re: not really to do with Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), t.p., 10:03
- Re: not really to do with Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Scott Kitterman, 06:50
- Re: Volunteers for the 2015 ICANN Nominating Committee, IAB Chair, 06:38
- Re: Volunteers for the 2015 ICANN Nominating Committee, Russ Housley, 06:23
- The IAB is Seeking Feedback on the Independent Stream Editor (ISE), IAB Chair, 05:54
- Re: really to do with Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Alessandro Vesely, 03:24
- Re: not really to do with Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Niels Dettenbach (Syndicat IT&Internet), 01:29
- Re: not really to do with Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Viktor Dukhovni, 00:32
July 15, 2014
- Re: not really to do with Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Dave Crocker, 23:57
- Re: not really to do with Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Scott Kitterman, 22:56
- Re: not really to do with Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), John Levine, 22:40
- Re: not really to do with Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Douglas Otis, 20:29
- Re: not really to do with Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Viktor Dukhovni, 19:20
- Re: [paws] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-paws-protocol-12, Robert Sparks, 16:43
- Re: not really to do with Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Dave Crocker, 15:47
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Scott Kitterman, 14:57
- Re: not really to do with Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), John Levine, 14:49
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:11
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:02
- Re: not really to do with Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), ned+ietf, 13:12
- RE: not really to do with Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Christian Huitema, 13:00
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Scott Kitterman, 11:35
- Re: not really to do with Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Dave Crocker, 11:23
- Re: not really to do with Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), ned+ietf, 11:03
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), John Levine, 10:45
- Re: not really to do with Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Viktor Dukhovni, 06:20
- not really to do with Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), t.p., 05:54
July 14, 2014
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Viktor Dukhovni, 22:34
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Scott Kitterman, 21:12
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Viktor Dukhovni, 20:33
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Douglas Otis, 20:21
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Viktor Dukhovni, 19:16
- Gen-ART Last Call Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-06, Ben Campbell, 17:40
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Scott Kitterman, 15:47
- RE: [90attendees] Hints on best airport transfer someone?, Linda Dunbar, 15:11
- Re: [90attendees] Parking near hotel?, John Levine, 14:41
- Re: [90attendees] Hints on best airport transfer someone?, John Levine, 14:29
- Re: [90attendees] Hints on best airport transfer someone?, Sandra Murphy, 14:29
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc), Dave Crocker, 12:34
- Re: [90attendees] Hints on best airport transfer someone?, Carsten Bormann, 11:09
- Re: [90attendees] Hints on best airport transfer someone?, Russell Sutherland, 10:47
- Re: [90attendees] Hints on best airport transfer someone?, Russell Sutherland, 10:47
- Re: [90all] IETF 90: Early-Bird Registration Cutoff 11 July, Patrice AVODO, 10:46
- Re: [90attendees] Hints on best airport transfer someone?, Paul Hoffman, 09:18
- Re: [90attendees] Hints on best airport transfer someone?, John Levine, 08:44
- Re: [90attendees] Hints on best airport transfer someone?, John Levine, 08:38
- Re: [90attendees] Toronto weather?, John Levine, 08:25
July 11, 2014
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-email-auth-codes-04.txt> (Email Authentication Status Codes) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 21:03
- Re: SMTP authentication (not soon), Dan Wing, 19:12
- Re: No Perpas, Samir Srivastava, 14:21
- No Perpas, Samir Srivastava, 14:15
- Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Rene Struik, 10:35
- Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Rene Struik, 10:35
- Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Rene Struik, 10:34
- RE: [90all] IETF 90: Early-Bird Registration Cutoff 11 July, Emma, 10:32
- Re: mcast.net and reverse for v6 multicast groups, Joe Abley, 10:31
- Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Viktor Dukhovni, 09:27
- LLN Plugfest at IETF 90 - Guidelines available, MARIA INES ROBLES, 01:36
July 10, 2014
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:54
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01, Viktor Dukhovni, 21:40
- mcast.net and reverse for v6 multicast groups, Michael Richardson, 15:13
- RE: Security review of draft-ietf-pce-questions-06, Adrian Farrel, 11:21
- Re: Security review of draft-ietf-pce-questions-06, Ben Laurie, 11:02
- RE: Security review of draft-ietf-pce-questions-06, Adrian Farrel, 10:59
- RE: [secdir] Security review of draft-ietf-pce-questions-06, Adrian Farrel, 10:56
- Re: [90all] IETF 90: Early-Bird Registration Cutoff 11 July, joel jaeggli, 10:21
- RE: [90all] IETF 90: Early-Bird Registration Cutoff 11 July, Emma, 10:17
- Re: SMTP authentication (not soon), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:19
- Re: SMTP authentication (not soon), Eliot Lear, 06:57
- Re: SMTP authentication (not soon), Dave Cridland, 04:14
- Re: SMTP authentication (not soon), Viktor Dukhovni, 03:53
- Re: SMTP authentication (not soon), Dave Cridland, 02:30
July 09, 2014
- Re: SMTP authentication (not soon), ned+ietf, 21:21
- Re: SMTP authentication (not soon), Stephen Farrell, 20:58
- Re: SMTP authentication (not soon), Viktor Dukhovni, 20:51
- Re: SMTP authentication (not soon), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 20:46
- IETF90 Audio Streaming Info, Nick Kukich, 20:40
- Re: SMTP authentication (not soon), Niels Dettenbach, 16:13
- Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Nico Williams, 11:16
- Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Nico Williams, 11:16
- Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Nico Williams, 11:15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Sam Hartman, 11:14
- Re: [secdir] Security review of draft-ietf-pce-questions-06, Hannes Tschofenig, 11:14
- Re: Security review of draft-ietf-pce-questions-06, Ben Laurie, 09:04
- SMTP authentication (not soon), Viktor Dukhovni, 08:50
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Stephen Farrell, 08:19
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Eliot Lear, 08:17
- Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Murray S. Kucherawy, 07:58
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Stephen Farrell, 06:27
- RE: Security review of draft-ietf-pce-questions-06, Adrian Farrel, 03:55
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Eliot Lear, 03:48
July 08, 2014
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Viktor Dukhovni, 23:44
- Re: [paws] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-paws-protocol-12, Vincent Chen, 21:22
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Randy Bush, 18:16
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, S Moonesamy, 17:51
- NOMCOM 2014-15: Results of Random Selection, NomCom Chair 2014, 16:00
- Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Michael Richardson, 15:52
- Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Joe Touch, 15:20
- Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Joe Touch, 14:54
- Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Dave Crocker, 14:08
- Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Stephen Farrell, 14:04
- Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC, Joe Touch, 12:55
- ISOC@IETF 90 Briefing Panel, Nicole Armstrong, 10:54
- Re: [paws] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-paws-protocol-12, Vincent Chen, 10:53
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-multicast-addr-arch-update-05, Ben Campbell, 09:12
- RE: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-multicast-addr-arch-update-05, mohamed.boucadair, 01:15
- RE: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Michel Py, 00:31
July 07, 2014
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-multicast-addr-arch-update-05, Ben Campbell, 16:29
- RE: Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-04, Qin Wu, 10:33
- RE: Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-04, Qin Wu, 10:33
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-stir-threats-03, Jari Arkko, 10:32
- Re: Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-04, Tom Taylor, 10:32
- Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-04, Tom Taylor, 10:31
- RE: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-multicast-addr-arch-update-05, mohamed.boucadair, 01:40
July 04, 2014
- Re: final list of qualified volunteers for 2014-2015 nomcom, Michael Richardson, 15:09
- final list of qualified volunteers for 2014-2015 nomcom, NomCom Chair 2014, 14:56
- clarification of seeds, NomCom Chair 2014, 10:41
- RE: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-multicast-addr-arch-update-05, mohamed.boucadair, 08:45
- Security review of draft-ietf-pce-questions-06, Ben Laurie, 07:10
July 03, 2014
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Volunteers for the 2015 ICANN Nominating Committee, Russ Housley, 16:05
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-multicast-addr-arch-update-05, Ben Campbell, 14:18
- Re: 64 bit firewalls, Douglas Otis, 13:10
- Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-paws-protocol-12, Robert Sparks, 12:28
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Fernando Gont, 11:56
- Re: 64 bit firewalls, Fernando Gont, 11:56
- Re: [Internetgovtech] ICANN discussions on the transition of NTIA's stewardship, Christian de Larrinaga, 11:22
- Re: [Internetgovtech] ICANN discussions on the transition of NTIA's stewardship, Patrik Fältström, 11:10
- Re: 64 bit firewalls, Paul Wouters, 10:08
- RE: [Internetgovtech] ICANN discussions on the transition of NTIA's stewardship, Michele Neylon - Blacknight, 10:07
- 64 bit firewalls, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:20
- Trustees Decide to Abandon “IETF Secretariat” Trademark, Tobias Gondrom, 08:45
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Michael Richardson, 08:36
- RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-multicast-addr-arch-update-05, mohamed.boucadair, 06:20
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Fernando Gont, 03:52
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Fernando Gont, 03:51
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Fernando Gont, 03:50
July 02, 2014
- Re: Reviving watersprings.org., Dan Wing, 21:18
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-secretaries-good-practices-06, Brian E Carpenter, 15:53
- Re: Reviving watersprings.org., Fred Baker (fred), 14:51
- Re: Reviving watersprings.org., manning bill, 14:36
- RE: Reviving watersprings.org., Elwyn Davies, 14:14
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-multicast-addr-arch-update-05, Ben Campbell, 14:10
- Re: Reviving watersprings.org., Andrew G. Malis, 13:30
- Re: Reviving watersprings.org., Dave Crocker, 13:20
- RE: Reviving watersprings.org., Adrian Farrel, 13:15
- Reviving watersprings.org., Warren Kumari, 13:09
- Invitation to request an IETF mentor, IETF Chair, 10:17
- Code Sprint in Toronto, IETF Chair, 09:52
- Re: [Internetgovtech] ICANN discussions on the transition of NTIA's stewardship, Seun Ojedeji, 08:43
July 01, 2014
- ICANN discussions on the transition of NTIA's stewardship, IETF Chair, 22:13
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Mark Andrews, 18:08
- Request for IETF Mentoring Program Volunteers, IETF Chair, 17:50
- RE: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Christian Huitema, 14:20
- IETF 90 Final Agenda, IETF Agenda, 14:07
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Fred Baker (fred), 13:08
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Fred Baker (fred), 11:55
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-06.txt> (A Framework for Ethernet Tree (E-Tree) Service over a Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Network) to Informational RFC, Adrian Farrel, 11:36
- Gen-art LC review: draft-secretaries-good-practices-06, Robert Sparks, 11:04
- Re: NTIA/IANA transition coordination group, Richard Omolo, 10:40
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet., Fernando Gont, 07:13
- NTIA/IANA transition coordination group, Adrian Farrel, 06:32