Thanks. I thought this list issue was solved/organised as any IETF list
should be moderated some how through our procedures as IETF is an
organisation. This list belongs to General Area, so IMHO each IETF list
MUST be connected to an Area, and it's AD is responsible as well with
moderators. However, I support the plans as long moderators follow some
clear procedure that can be used while they post (they need to include
procedure texts in their posts).
AB
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014, IETF Chair wrote:
The ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org <javascript:;> list is very active. It hosts
varied
discussions ranging from last calls to IETF organisation matters to any
Internet technology-related topics that come up. We all have seen how much
discussion there is, and occasionally, discussions that become unproductive
or repetitive. Part of the root cause of this is that unlike most IETF
lists, there is no working group chair overseeing and driving discussions.
The IESG has discussed this and plans to add moderators to manage the list
discussion. The moderators will track and guide discussions and remind
people when they get outside of the lines. Please respect the feedback from
the moderators when they say, for instance, that an issue has been already
previously discussed.
The moderation system will not affect other mailing list management
methods that are used on this list or in the IETF in general.
If you have feedback on this plan, please let us know.
Jari Arkko for the IESG