Michael Richardson wrote:
Regardless of how/if/why/when we process DMARC as a specification, we need to
decide how ietf.org MTA is going to deal with things.
1) someone has to fund changes to mailman, and perform testing, installation,
and community education for the IETF mailing lists. That implies that
we have to decide *for ourselves* where and how we will "break" the
DMARC/DKIM connection, and if we will reject email from p=reject senders
before we attempt to relay.
Leaving aside the question of whether or not IETF should use a
workaround, I thought there was a mailman patch to deal with re-writing
from addresses for DMARC p=reject.
Note that this is from reading mailops and such, not person experience -
as we use Sympa in our shop, for which there is a patch (actually it's
in the most recent release).
Miles Fidelman -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca>, Sandelman
Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra