I agree. Moderated mailing lists in these forums are bogus.
--Tom
On Jul 22, 2014:11:12 AM, at 11:12 AM, manning bill
<bmanning(_at_)isi(_dot_)edu> wrote:
like this has never been a problem in the past … yet every time it has worked
out that a reasonable adults, we were able to get past
the problems and the list survived - until now. Moderation is the explicit
application of personal bias over the discussion. In other words,
censorship. Which is your prerogative - since you are the current,temporary
steward. But it will drive more work away from IETF.
/bill
PO Box 12317
Marina del Rey, CA 90295
310.322.8102
On 22July2014Tuesday, at 7:24, IETF Chair <chair(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org> wrote:
The ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org list is very active. It hosts varied
discussions ranging from last calls to IETF organisation matters to any
Internet technology-related topics that come up. We all have seen how much
discussion there is, and occasionally, discussions that become unproductive
or repetitive. Part of the root cause of this is that unlike most IETF
lists, there is no working group chair overseeing and driving discussions.
The IESG has discussed this and plans to add moderators to manage the list
discussion. The moderators will track and guide discussions and remind
people when they get outside of the lines. Please respect the feedback from
the moderators when they say, for instance, that an issue has been already
previously discussed.
The moderation system will not affect other mailing list management methods
that are used on this list or in the IETF in general.
If you have feedback on this plan, please let us know.
Jari Arkko for the IESG
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail