On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Dave Crocker <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net>
wrote:
On 9/11/2014 10:34 PM, Christian Huitema wrote:
...
...
At that point, the issue is mostly with the UI. If my reader did
recognize the "simple forwarding" case from "authorized remailers,"
then the message wrapping solution would be just fine. The good thing
is that it is very much under my control.
This suggests defining a wrapping convention that is sufficiently
distinction so that receiving software can know it is this specific type
of wrapping and can choose to unwrap the message, without doing
unwrapping for other kinds of encapsulated mail.
content type message/re-mailed or something?
Thanks,
Donald
=============================
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
d3e3e3(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net