On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Dave Crocker <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net>
wrote:
On 9/15/2014 2:45 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
The worst case, which is not a fantasy, is that 5 large companies
encourage
their staff to volunteer, so we end up with 5 pairs of large-company
staff and nobody from the rest of the community. But (as Mike seems to
imply) if we put in rules to make this impossible, we'd be even further
from "each eligible volunteer is equally likely to be selected."
So this does need clarity of intent, one way or the other.
Make it max 1 per company.
Real and substantial diversity is essential.
If we cannot get an adequate nomcom on that basis, we've got bigger
problems and nomcom selection isn't the place to try to solve it.
[MB] I totally agree with Dave. I think that also helps in that people
that are from bigger companies often have the most people that are willing
and more importantly able to fill the positions. Thus, this also reduces
the potential appearance of bias in terms of voting members favoring
nominees from their own companies. [/MB]
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net