ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)

2014-10-07 11:28:20
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Abdussalam Baryun <
abdussalambaryun(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:

The draft in subject is not product of IETF WG so it has no consensus
needed, however, in the document Page in data tracker it should IETF-state
as None and that there were consensus as Yes. We need to make this error
stop. There are other state/info issues with other RFCs that we need to be
careful when we input but  I will give some examples;


It's not true that no consensus is needed for a document just because it's
not a WG product.  Anything that comes through the IETF stream (including
AD-sponsored documents) need to reflect consensus.

-MSK
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>