Re: Proposed IESG structure change

Stewart:

Thanks. Certainly food for thought.

The proposed change relates to how the organisation is divided into parts, what 
areas we have. I think that is a necessary part, but it should not be the only 
part. Additional changes are certainly worth considering, and the IESG has been 
considering them as well. In particular, I would be very interested in lowering 
the per-person workload so that a broader set of people could consider IETF 
leadership positions. Including even more people who are great engineers and 
also needed elsewhere.

(FWIW, we have a few ADs who are succeeding with a fully-loaded day job and 
their AD task. By the way, strangely enough, one of the difficulties in 
“letting go” in the IESG and having even more of the work performed in the 
working groups relates to how view ADs decide to run our daily business. There 
certainly is a lot to do, and on large areas or in difficult situations a lot 
of effort is needed. However, personal management styles differ greatly. It is 
also about the culture and personal choice and not only about how we’ve defined 
the AD tasks in our process RFCs.)

Jari

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail