Re: HTTP/2 has been approved

ietf

2015-02-19 12:09:44

On Feb 19, 2015, at 10:16, Michael Richardson 
<mcr+ietf(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca> wrote:

I propose that this document skip PS, and go straight to Internet Standard to
accurately reflect the status of this document.


Six months after it gets an RFC# I’d completely support this.

spt

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
HTTP/2 has been approved, Jari Arkko Re: HTTP/2 has been approved, Michael Richardson Re: HTTP/2 has been approved, Yoav Nir HTTP/2 should be published at Internet Standard, Michael Richardson Re: HTTP/2 should be published at Internet Standard, Yoav Nir Re: HTTP/2 should be published at Internet Standard, Larry Masinter Re: HTTP/2 has been approved, Julian Reschke Re: HTTP/2 has been approved, Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: HTTP/2 has been approved, Julian Reschke Re: HTTP/2 has been approved, Sean Turner <= Re: HTTP/2 has been approved, Paul Hoffman Re: HTTP/2 has been approved, Bjoern Hoehrmann Re: HTTP/2 has been approved, Eliot Lear Re: HTTP/2 has been approved, David Morris Re: HTTP/2 has been approved, ned+ietf Re: HTTP/2 has been approved, Jari Arkko

Previous by Date:	Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kucherawy-rfc7437bis-03.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy
Next by Date:	Re: A different way to look at the problem, Ted Hardie
Previous by Thread:	Re: HTTP/2 has been approved, Julian Reschke
Next by Thread:	Re: HTTP/2 has been approved, Paul Hoffman
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]