Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP

On Aug 21, 2015, at 1:49 AM, Eliot Lear <lear(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:
> ... As to whether or not there are other ways of catching
> crooks, that is an assertion that you cannot prove; and it is well
> outside our area of expertise, as an organization.
That is probably one of the reasons why the IETF (as a formal endorsor of the
principle of transparency in standards development [1]) goes out of its way to
make sure that there is adequate advance public notice of proposed standards
development activities and the scope of work to be undertaken; i.e. so that 
those
parties with expertise (and who might be affected) have the opportunity to fully
engage in the process.

/John

[1] open-stand.org <http://open-stand.org/>

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail