Am Donnerstag, 10. Dezember 2015, 14:42:03 schrieb Alexey Eromenko:
I believe, that it is superior to both IPv4 and IPv6, simpler than
both, and intended as a replacement for both. Substantial improvement
on both.
I think one main argument against "Five" would/will be it's "inefficiency"
from a very first, historical and theoretical view onto it. IPv4 and 6
addresses fit "exactly" binary structures which are widely found in hardware
(32/64bit) - but i know, the praxis could be more or less another story
today...
And if i read correctly, do you used the IPv4 specs widely and "just" added
the "fifth field" / 8bits, which at least some of us still had in mind some
times in the past too ß)
Do you have any working setup or implementation anywhere? Or a small howto for
implementing a own test bed with open source stuff?
many thanks,
Niels.
--
---
Niels Dettenbach
Syndicat IT & Internet
http://www.syndicat.com
PGP: https://syndicat.com/pub_key.asc
---
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.